Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

by April 29, 2025
April 29, 2025
Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

The sugar tax currently applied to fizzy drinks could soon be extended to milkshakes and similar products under new government proposals revealed on Monday.

The Treasury launched a consultation on plans to remove the exemption for dairy-based drinks—and their non-dairy alternatives such as oat and rice milk—bringing them under the scope of the soft drinks industry levy (SDIL). The government is also considering tightening the sugar threshold that triggers the levy, lowering it from 5g to 4g per 100ml.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves first indicated last year that the government would consider broadening the scope of the levy. The Treasury has now confirmed its intention to move ahead with the changes, citing health concerns over the high sugar content of many milk-based drinks.

According to government analysis, about 203 pre-packed milk-based drinks currently on the market—accounting for 93 per cent of the category’s sales—could be affected unless manufacturers reduce their sugar levels.

The SDIL was introduced in 2018 by the Conservative government as part of a broader anti-obesity drive. Milk-based drinks were originally exempted due to concerns over the importance of calcium intake, particularly for children. However, the Treasury now says that such drinks contribute only 3.5 per cent of young people’s calcium intake, suggesting that the potential health benefits of their consumption are outweighed by the risks posed by excess sugar.

“By bringing milk-based drinks and milk substitute drinks into the SDIL, the government would introduce a tax incentive for manufacturers to build on existing progress and further reduce sugar in their recipes,” a Treasury spokesperson said.

Following the introduction of the SDIL, 89 per cent of fizzy drinks sold in the UK were reformulated to avoid the tax, significantly reducing their sugar content.

However, the proposal has drawn criticism from some quarters. Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the free-market thinktank the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: “The sugar tax has been such a dramatic failure that it should be repealed, not expanded. Sugar taxes have never worked anywhere. What happened to Starmer’s promise to not raise taxes on working people?”

The government’s consultation on the proposed changes is open and will run until 21 July, inviting views from industry stakeholders, public health groups and the wider public.

Read more:
Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump poised to ease impact of car tariffs with reimbursement plan for US automakers
next post
Labour’s benefit cuts could cost UK economy billions, warns Trussell Trust

You may also like

EU ‘omnibus’ offers key opportunity to drive competitiveness...

April 4, 2025

Amazon set to bring Warhammer 40,000 shows and...

December 19, 2023

Aston Martin agrees deal to make electric vehicles...

June 26, 2023

Trump extends TikTok sale deadline amid ongoing talks...

April 4, 2025

What does a purchaser do in an organization?

August 4, 2022

Ireland to become first country in the world...

May 23, 2023

Valuing your business for sale? The key methods...

February 7, 2024

Millions will miss school in biggest teacher strike...

January 30, 2023

Match.com ad showing woman carrying out subservient tasks...

October 5, 2022

Rising prices and cost of living crisis hit...

October 20, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

      July 3, 2025
    • Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash ‘colossal mistake’ shuttering USAID

      July 2, 2025
    • Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ stalls in House amid conservative mutiny threats

      July 2, 2025
    • Democratic doctors’ protest against Trump’s ‘beautiful bill’ derailed by flood of US Capitol tourists

      July 2, 2025
    • Missed Disney’s Rally? Grab This Defined-Risk Put Spread for a Second Chance

      July 2, 2025
    • Market Signals Align – Is a Bigger Move Ahead?

      July 2, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,365)
    • Investing (2,094)
    • Politics (15,921)
    • Stocks (3,187)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved