Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

by April 29, 2025
April 29, 2025
Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

The sugar tax currently applied to fizzy drinks could soon be extended to milkshakes and similar products under new government proposals revealed on Monday.

The Treasury launched a consultation on plans to remove the exemption for dairy-based drinks—and their non-dairy alternatives such as oat and rice milk—bringing them under the scope of the soft drinks industry levy (SDIL). The government is also considering tightening the sugar threshold that triggers the levy, lowering it from 5g to 4g per 100ml.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves first indicated last year that the government would consider broadening the scope of the levy. The Treasury has now confirmed its intention to move ahead with the changes, citing health concerns over the high sugar content of many milk-based drinks.

According to government analysis, about 203 pre-packed milk-based drinks currently on the market—accounting for 93 per cent of the category’s sales—could be affected unless manufacturers reduce their sugar levels.

The SDIL was introduced in 2018 by the Conservative government as part of a broader anti-obesity drive. Milk-based drinks were originally exempted due to concerns over the importance of calcium intake, particularly for children. However, the Treasury now says that such drinks contribute only 3.5 per cent of young people’s calcium intake, suggesting that the potential health benefits of their consumption are outweighed by the risks posed by excess sugar.

“By bringing milk-based drinks and milk substitute drinks into the SDIL, the government would introduce a tax incentive for manufacturers to build on existing progress and further reduce sugar in their recipes,” a Treasury spokesperson said.

Following the introduction of the SDIL, 89 per cent of fizzy drinks sold in the UK were reformulated to avoid the tax, significantly reducing their sugar content.

However, the proposal has drawn criticism from some quarters. Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the free-market thinktank the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: “The sugar tax has been such a dramatic failure that it should be repealed, not expanded. Sugar taxes have never worked anywhere. What happened to Starmer’s promise to not raise taxes on working people?”

The government’s consultation on the proposed changes is open and will run until 21 July, inviting views from industry stakeholders, public health groups and the wider public.

Read more:
Milkshakes could face sugar tax under Treasury plans to expand levy

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump poised to ease impact of car tariffs with reimbursement plan for US automakers
next post
Labour’s benefit cuts could cost UK economy billions, warns Trussell Trust

You may also like

Post Office Horizon inquiry: ‘enough evidence for police...

December 30, 2023

UK Retailers Enjoy 40% Boost in Summer Sales...

September 18, 2024

Elon Musk to start cutting Twitter workforce

November 4, 2022

Charities seek to distance themselves from Michelle Mone...

November 25, 2022

Developers have spent £3.5 billion buying unloved office...

May 26, 2025

5 secret santa gift ideas to impress your...

December 16, 2022

Rachel Reeves first Labour Budget in 14 years...

October 30, 2024

Sean Edwards is a Leader in Telecommunications with...

February 10, 2025

Truss set to announce £150bn scheme to freeze...

September 8, 2022

Why some of the old rules still apply...

March 19, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • ‘Fully justified’: Graham plows ahead with Trump border funding despite Paul’s objections

      June 12, 2025
    • Mike Lawler tells NY Dem to ‘f— off’ after chaos ignites on House floor

      June 12, 2025
    • White House takes interest in proposed Russian sanctions as Ukraine War peace talks drag on

      June 12, 2025
    • Trump’s plan to slash ‘woke’ foreign aid, NPR funds clears House as Senate battle looms

      June 12, 2025
    • What the S&P 500, VIX, and ARKK are Telling Us Now

      June 12, 2025
    • Trump’s Lawless, Baseless Immigration Ban

      June 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,200)
    • Investing (2,031)
    • Politics (15,623)
    • Stocks (3,143)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved