Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Congress Should Embrace the Cuts in Trump’s Skinny Budget

by May 2, 2025
May 2, 2025
Congress Should Embrace the Cuts in Trump’s Skinny Budget

Romina Boccia and Dominik Lett

President Donald Trump has released his “skinny” budget blueprint for fiscal year (FY) 2026, three months past the statutory February deadline. The proposal calls for a significant change in discretionary spending priorities, surging funding for defense and border security while slashing spending on other nondefense programs. The administration deserves credit for its refusal to abuse phony emergency spending and calls to downsize nondefense programs, including the elimination of several unneeded agencies. 

In many respects, the budget enshrines the priorities of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), such as agency consolidation, workforce reductions, and federal divestment from state and local functions. Congress should embrace the spending reductions in the budget and act on them.

Note that this is a partial “skinny” budget, so it makes no real attempt to restrain the primary drivers of the deficit—Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Without changes to these old-age retirement and health care programs, the US will remain hurtling towards a fiscal crisis. The administration has indicated it will release its full budget containing entitlement changes at a later date.

Disappointing Topline

At first glance, the topline numbers are striking. The administration proposes holding defense spending flat while shrinking nondefense spending by 23 percent relative to base FY2025 levels. That would mark a significant reduction compared to the prior year (-$163 billion) and would be a notable improvement over the current discretionary spending trajectory. Unfortunately, Republicans plan on boosting defense and border security funding using reconciliation, a process distinct from appropriations. After accounting for those plus-ups, the requested topline base discretionary funding level will be equal to FY2025’s base enacted level of $1.6 trillion. If you include so-called non-base funding (generally emergency or other special budget categories designed to evade spending caps), the FY2026 discretionary total stands at nearly $1.7 trillion, a 7.6 percent reduction compared to FY2025 total discretionary levels.

In any case, the president’s discretionary budget topline should not be a cause for celebration. 

Debt as a share of the economy is slated to surpass WWII-era record-high levels by FY2029 and continue to grow thereafter. Such high levels of debt slow economic growth, boost inflation, and raise interest costs, undermining the standard of living for all Americans. Given the severity of the fiscal outlook, the US should be returning to pre-pandemic levels of discretionary spending, not maintaining Biden-era levels of spending.

Here are reactions to the president’s budget from fellow Cato scholars.

Reviving Federalism

Cato’s Chris Edwards said, 

One theme of the administration’s budget proposal is to revive federalism by cutting grants to the states for education, housing, energy subsidies, water projects, and other properly local activities. Grants to the states are perhaps the most wasteful federal spending of all, so such cuts would both save money and promote improved governance. The states have their own powerful fiscal engines and are entirely capable of funding their own local priorities.

Eliminating Unneeded Cultural Subsidies

Cato’s Ryan Bourne explained,

President Trump’s proposal to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities is welcome and should be made reality. There is no clear constitutional or economic case for federal arts and humanities subsidies. Great art and scholarship can thrive through market and philanthropic support. If we want cultural freedom and artistic excellence, without politicization, the best thing Washington can do is get out of the way.

Cutting Waste at HHS

Cato’s Michael Cannon noted,

The Trump administration proposes to cut spending at the Department of Health and Human Services by $33 billion. While this proposal is a step in the right direction, it is merely a 26 percent cut to 9 percent of HHS’s $1.8 trillion in annual spending. There is plenty of room to cut HHS outlays dramatically and still have enough money left for legitimate public health activities, employees who cost-effectively block improper spending, and employees who remove market-entry barriers.

Defunding the OECD

Cato’s Adam Michel explained, 

The discretionary budget request includes a $1.7 billion reduction in assessed and voluntary contributions to international organizations, including the United Nations. Cutting UN funding is a great start. The request stays silent on US funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which has led the European proposal for an international tax cartel to raise taxes on America’s most successful businesses. The budget request should more explicitly spell out the proposed cuts to US support for the OECD Part 1 core budget and Part 2 voluntary contributions. This additional specificity would be consistent with the president’s Executive Order terminating US involvement in the Global Tax Deal and letters from House and Senate members requesting the appropriations committees to prohibit US funding of the OECD.

Capping Spending and Closing Loopholes

In addition to acting on the president’s spending cut proposals, Congress should adopt binding 10-year discretionary spending caps with a 2 percent annual spending growth limit. Imposing transparent resource constraints should motivate legislators to prioritize core government functions and more carefully examine the trade-offs inherent in all spending decisions. Likewise, Congress should also implement offsets for any new emergency designations, deterring phony and wasteful emergency spending.

Now the ball is in Congress’s court. Hopefully, legislators will take the bold action needed to curb runaway spending and right-size federal government, but don’t hold your breath.

Note: This will be a running blog that we will update with additional information going forward.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Ex-Pelosi aide accuses Hakeem Jeffries of ‘squandering’ anti-Trump opportunities in stunning rebuke
next post
Trump’s Cuts to Federal Science Budget Are Justified, So Why Doesn’t He Justify Them (Properly)?

You may also like

Happy Yeltsin Supermarket Day!

September 16, 2024

Ten Spending Cuts for President Trump

November 8, 2024

Milei’s Remarkable Victory in Argentina Paves the Way...

November 20, 2023

Is China a Threat to the Fed? A...

August 15, 2022

Who Loses from Immigration Restrictions?

January 23, 2025

New Defending Globalization Content: Globalization and Women and...

January 2, 2025

Explaining the Border Standoff Between Texas and the...

January 31, 2024

Friday Feature: Arborbrook Christian Academy

November 15, 2024

Responding to Senator Rubio on Industrial Policy

April 25, 2024

Employee Retention Credit Shows Folly of Tax Code...

October 12, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Tesla sees UK sales rebound in June as EV market accelerates

      July 5, 2025
    • Hived raises $42m to roll out electric delivery fleet across southern England

      July 5, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • “A turning point for education”: James Caan launches bold education reform plan in House of Lords

      July 5, 2025
    • ‘Invest in Women’ fund criticised for slow rollout as MPs call for bolder action

      July 5, 2025
    • Iran regime escalates repression toward ‘North Korea-style model of isolation and control’

      July 4, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,397)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,945)
    • Stocks (3,190)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved