Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Four Reasons School Choice Is Good, but Federal Is Bad

by May 13, 2025
May 13, 2025
Four Reasons School Choice Is Good, but Federal Is Bad

Neal McCluskey

A $5 billion scholarship tax credit is a part of the budget reconciliation bill just introduced in Congress. As a member of the Educational Freedom Supporters of America in good standing, few would doubt that I think school choice is an excellent thing. And I certainly understand the desire to take it nationwide via one big, beautiful, federal bill. But doing that would not ultimately be a beautiful thing, for four major reasons:

It is unconstitutional: The Constitution gives the feds only specific, enumerated powers and all others are with the people or states. Education is nowhere among those powers, which means Washington has no authority to push school choice nationally, including through the tax code.
It threatens one-stop shopping to regulate private education: Federal choice will start to get private schools nationwide connected to money associated with the federal government. A tax credit is not a voucher—money directly from the government—and is less prone to regulation, but it still carries rules. And more rules could be added as time goes on, including by future federal policymakers who like unionized workforces, student bathroom choice, or other policies many current choice supporters might not like. Leaving school choice to 50 different states diffuses the regulatory threat.
The states are doing very well: Texas just passed a $1 billion school choice program, joining a huge choice boom in recent years and getting the country to the point where more than half of school-aged kids are eligible for private choice programs. Alas, some supporters of the federal tax credit have looked at this and lamented that some states, typically blue ones like New York, have not adopted choice, and they want an end run around those states. Connected to point number one, that would violate federalism—the feds do not get to bypass states just because some people dislike those states’ policies.
The tax code is already complicated: We do not need yet another tax credit added to a highly complex federal tax code.

The good news is that there are some places where the federal government can, constitutionally, promote school choice: in Washington, DC itself, for military families, and for families served by the Bureau of Indian Education.

It should focus on those families and otherwise leave choice programs where they belong: the states.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Saudis deploy mobile McDonald’s for Trump’s trip to the kingdom
next post
Trump’s Afrikaner Refugees: Strange Process, Right Decision

You may also like

Congress Should Protect Americans by Ignoring the FDIC’s...

May 11, 2023

Officers Who Make Final Decisions for the Government...

April 18, 2025

WATCH: An American Small Business-Owner Explains Why President...

April 24, 2025

Simpson-Bowles 2.0 Won’t Cut It, a BRAC-like Commission...

October 17, 2024

Did Tax Cuts Cause Rising Deficits?

July 5, 2023

Trump Attempts Price Controls on Prescription Drugs

May 12, 2025

House FISA Bill’s “Stasi” Amendment Co-Author Lashes Out

April 17, 2024

Unintended Consequences of Vaccine Mandates: Good Intentions Are...

March 4, 2024

The FDA Finally Removes a Huge Barrier to...

March 7, 2025

U.S. Allowing Weapons Customers to Commit Crimes Against...

August 29, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Senate Republicans ram Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ through key test vote

      June 29, 2025
    • Chief Justice Roberts sounds alarm on dangerous rhetoric aimed at judges from politicians

      June 29, 2025
    • Britain’s fastest-growing firms revealed for 2025: Dfyne, Nala’s Baby and Hawkstone lead the charge

      June 29, 2025
    • Schumer to force Senate reading of Trump’s entire ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 28, 2025
    • Rubio condemns Iran’s ‘unacceptable’ threats against IAEA director

      June 28, 2025
    • Key blue state Republican says Senate’s local tax write-off offer is a ‘good deal’

      June 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,330)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,853)
    • Stocks (3,177)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved