Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

US Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Would Be an Epic Mistake

by May 15, 2025
May 15, 2025
US Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Would Be an Epic Mistake

Clark Packard

Earlier this year, Rep. Tom Tiffany (R‑WI) introduced a resolution to withdraw the United States from the World Trade Organization (WTO). The resolution is privileged so it will force a vote on the House floor in the coming months. Former chairman of the WTO’s Appellate Body and current Cato Institute scholar James Bacchus and I participated in a Cato briefing event on Capitol Hill earlier today, where we explained why such a move would severely damage US economic interests and its global influence.

As Bacchus documents in a forthcoming Cato Institute paper, the United States has benefited tremendously from its participation in the WTO and its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The GATT and WTO have facilitated a massive expansion in global trade as tariffs have fallen and red tape has been cut. This led to lower prices for American consumers—both firms and families—and greater access to foreign markets for American producers. Withdrawing from the WTO would open the door to higher prices and fewer varieties and allow foreign governments to increase tariffs and impose nontariff barriers on American goods and services. Indeed, the Bertelsmann Stiftung, a German think tank, in 2019 found that WTO membership increased the US Gross Domestic Product by about $87 billion, more than any other WTO member country. 

Likewise, coming on the heels of President Trump’s reckless and ill-advised trade wars, withdrawing from the WTO would further erode the United States’ global standing. As the world’s largest economy, the US has historically played a leading role within the WTO system. In our absence, much of the leadership within the organization would fall to China, the second-largest economy. In calling for the US to withdraw from the organization, Rep. Tiffany argued that the WTO system has “overlooked” several of China’s “unfair” trade practices. It seems odd, then, to advocate a position that would grant China a more commanding role within the WTO system. 

Some libertarians and market-oriented analysts have a complicated relationship with trade agreements. Most would prefer unilateral reductions in tariffs and nontariff barriers since the economic benefits of global trade largely flow from imports. Politically, however, trade agreements play a valuable role in constraining the protectionist proclivities of politicians and regulators. 

A higher tariff regime increases incentives for businesses to engage in rent-seeking—that is, bending government power to confer economic benefits on themselves or disadvantage their competitors. New research from Goldman Sachs suggests that multilateral trade agreements through the GATT/WTO system since the early 1970s “brought down tariff levels and reduced governments’ discretion in imposing them.” This means, they add, that the “relationship between countries’ tariff structures and rent-seeking measures” largely disappeared. 

(Source: Jan Hatzius et al., “The Long-Term Effects of Higher Tariffs (Abecasis),” Goldman Sachs, May 14, 2025)

To be sure, the WTO system needs reform. Membership within the organization, however, has conferred immense benefits on the United States and its citizens. Proposals to withdraw the United States from the WTO do not stand up to serious scrutiny and would be a colossal policy misstep. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Rubio doubts ‘anything productive’ will happen in Ukraine peace talks without Trump, Putin
next post
What Sector Rotation Says About the Market Cycle Right Now

You may also like

Religious Charter Schools? Let States Decide

June 2, 2025

DOGE Recommendations: Federal Health Spending

December 11, 2024

DOGE Recommendations: Slash Federal Health Care Regulation

December 19, 2024

Biden’s Phony Deficit Reduction

March 13, 2024

Congress Should Reverse its $196 Billion Social Security...

February 10, 2025

The “Zombification” of Qualified Immunity?

May 15, 2024

Congress Investigates Debanking, Reintroduces (Un)Fair Access

February 11, 2025

The Republican Study Committee Budget on the Key...

June 16, 2023

House Budget Committee Advances Fiscal Commission to Address...

January 23, 2024

The New Deal and Recovery, Part 20: The...

August 9, 2022

Religious Charter Schools? Let States Decide

June 2, 2025

DOGE Recommendations: Federal Health Spending

December 11, 2024

DOGE Recommendations: Slash Federal Health Care Regulation

December 19, 2024

Biden’s Phony Deficit Reduction

March 13, 2024

Congress Should Reverse its $196 Billion Social Security...

February 10, 2025

The “Zombification” of Qualified Immunity?

May 15, 2024

Congress Investigates Debanking, Reintroduces (Un)Fair Access

February 11, 2025

The Republican Study Committee Budget on the Key...

June 16, 2023

House Budget Committee Advances Fiscal Commission to Address...

January 23, 2024

The New Deal and Recovery, Part 20: The...

August 9, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Kash Patel torches ‘conspiracy theories’ about Bondi feud amid MAGA furor over Epstein files

      July 13, 2025
    • Trump defends embattled AG Pam Bondi, says ‘nobody cares about’ Jeffrey Epstein

      July 12, 2025
    • Bondi says all charges against doctor who allegedly destroyed COVID vaccines have been dropped

      July 12, 2025
    • Meet ‘China’s man in Lima’ who jetted over to US to collect trains donated by Biden admin

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside Dan Bongino’s tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout

      July 12, 2025
    • Could Butler happen again? Former Secret Service agents weigh in on political violence in 2025

      July 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,456)
    • Investing (2,118)
    • Politics (16,018)
    • Stocks (3,205)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved