Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A College Endowment Tax Is the Wrong Federal Policy

by May 20, 2025
May 20, 2025
A College Endowment Tax Is the Wrong Federal Policy

Neal McCluskey

To stick it to “woke, elite universities,” House Republicans have included a new tax on private college endowments in their “big, beautiful bill.” The rate would top out at 21 percent for endowments of at least $2 million per student. While endowment sizes can be unseemly—Harvard has a stash bigger than the GDP of most countries—the tax would be bad policy for several reasons.

First, the tax system should never be used to punish people based on their political opinions. But that is clearly what House Republicans are doing when they identify the targets of their tax as “woke.” Punishing ideological adversaries might not be their only motivation—they might want new revenue or think college endowments get sweetheart tax treatment—but it is unquestionably a motive.

Second, what about the sweetheart treatment possibility? That seems dubious, at least relative to how nonprofits generally are taxed.

I am not an expert on taxation, but it appears that non-university endowments, such as private foundations and nonoperating foundations, face nothing like a 21 percent net investment income tax, instead facing 1 to 2 percent taxes or 5 percent payout requirements, respectively. Unless I’m missing something, rich colleges would be getting much harsher treatment. And that is not the end of the targeting: Public universities, which have huge, direct government funding advantages over private institutions, would be exempted, as would religious institutions meeting certain criteria, including being founded after July 4, 1776. That puts a very small group of institutions—look at the years when Ivy League institutions were founded—in the crosshairs.

The beautiful bill would also raise net investment income taxes on some foundations, but the top rate would only be 10 percent for those with assets of $5 billion or more. And it, too, would violate the “no political punishment” rule I stated above, with committee Republicans saying explicitly that the target is “radical left-wing organizations in the tax-exempt sector.”

Third, endowments consist of money voluntarily given to schools by funders. That is what we should want in a free, diverse society. Meanwhile, the federal government cumulatively gives hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to college students, which they eventually deliver to institutions and to higher ed-based researchers who often undertake wasteful or ineffective projects. What Congress should do is phase out this forced taxpayer funding, requiring the Ivory Tower to be built on voluntary giving. You know, like endowment funds.

If people want to give their own money to “woke, elite universities,” who is government to judge? Instead, it should worry about its own, forced funding of higher ed.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Hegseth orders Pentagon to launch comprehensive review into ‘catastrophic’ 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal
next post
S&P 500, Bitcoin & XLK: What the Charts Are Saying Now

You may also like

Senator Vance, Please Keep the Feds out of...

October 5, 2024

Presidents Must Take Accountability for the Officers They...

May 1, 2023

Six Questions on Donald Trump’s Conviction

June 18, 2024

Three Lessons from the SEC’s Grudging Bitcoin ETF...

January 12, 2024

Gender Board Quotas: Still Unhelpful to Working Women

September 7, 2023

New Defending Globalization Content: Cryptocurrency and Food

November 7, 2023

Temporary Tax Extenders Are Still Bad Policy

November 30, 2023

Populism and the Future of the Fed: A...

July 29, 2022

High Taxes, High Crime

May 28, 2024

A Dollarization Reading List

October 17, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Video Surveillance as a Guardian of Safety: Psychological Effects and Engineering Aspects

      July 23, 2025
    • Tech Taps the Brakes, Homebuilders Hit the Gas: See the Rotation on StockCharts Today

      July 22, 2025
    • Obama denies Trump’s ‘bizarre allegations’ that he was Russiagate ‘ringleader’ in rare statement

      July 22, 2025
    • Huckabee hits back at Western countries that ‘side’ with terror group Hamas

      July 22, 2025
    • Jeffrey Epstein case reopens focus on Ghislaine Maxwell as deputy AG steps in

      July 22, 2025
    • Key Features to Look for in a Rechargeable Pod-Style Vape Kit

      July 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,549)
    • Investing (2,139)
    • Politics (16,159)
    • Stocks (3,223)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved