Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A College Endowment Tax Is the Wrong Federal Policy

by May 20, 2025
May 20, 2025
A College Endowment Tax Is the Wrong Federal Policy

Neal McCluskey

To stick it to “woke, elite universities,” House Republicans have included a new tax on private college endowments in their “big, beautiful bill.” The rate would top out at 21 percent for endowments of at least $2 million per student. While endowment sizes can be unseemly—Harvard has a stash bigger than the GDP of most countries—the tax would be bad policy for several reasons.

First, the tax system should never be used to punish people based on their political opinions. But that is clearly what House Republicans are doing when they identify the targets of their tax as “woke.” Punishing ideological adversaries might not be their only motivation—they might want new revenue or think college endowments get sweetheart tax treatment—but it is unquestionably a motive.

Second, what about the sweetheart treatment possibility? That seems dubious, at least relative to how nonprofits generally are taxed.

I am not an expert on taxation, but it appears that non-university endowments, such as private foundations and nonoperating foundations, face nothing like a 21 percent net investment income tax, instead facing 1 to 2 percent taxes or 5 percent payout requirements, respectively. Unless I’m missing something, rich colleges would be getting much harsher treatment. And that is not the end of the targeting: Public universities, which have huge, direct government funding advantages over private institutions, would be exempted, as would religious institutions meeting certain criteria, including being founded after July 4, 1776. That puts a very small group of institutions—look at the years when Ivy League institutions were founded—in the crosshairs.

The beautiful bill would also raise net investment income taxes on some foundations, but the top rate would only be 10 percent for those with assets of $5 billion or more. And it, too, would violate the “no political punishment” rule I stated above, with committee Republicans saying explicitly that the target is “radical left-wing organizations in the tax-exempt sector.”

Third, endowments consist of money voluntarily given to schools by funders. That is what we should want in a free, diverse society. Meanwhile, the federal government cumulatively gives hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to college students, which they eventually deliver to institutions and to higher ed-based researchers who often undertake wasteful or ineffective projects. What Congress should do is phase out this forced taxpayer funding, requiring the Ivory Tower to be built on voluntary giving. You know, like endowment funds.

If people want to give their own money to “woke, elite universities,” who is government to judge? Instead, it should worry about its own, forced funding of higher ed.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Hegseth orders Pentagon to launch comprehensive review into ‘catastrophic’ 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal
next post
S&P 500, Bitcoin & XLK: What the Charts Are Saying Now

You may also like

How Does the Congressional Government Spending Deal Measure...

January 9, 2024

The First Step Act Applies to Resentenced Defendants

May 6, 2024

Will Massachusetts Be the Next State to Defy...

December 19, 2023

What Does a Pro-Competition Policy for an Innovation...

December 17, 2024

Should CMS Raise the Price (Reduce the Subsidy)...

February 21, 2024

House Judiciary Committee Report Documents More Evidence of...

May 13, 2024

Friday Feature: Solstice Hybrid Academy

May 30, 2025

Free Markets Did Not Fail the Middle Class

May 2, 2025

The Case for Conditioning Disaster Aid to California

January 24, 2025

Ezra Klein’s Conversion to Libertarianism Proceeds Apace

December 26, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • M&S reopens online orders after cyberattack disruption

      June 10, 2025
    • UK payrolls see biggest drop since covid as wage growth slows and job market weakens

      June 10, 2025
    • Why AI and green tech are vital to SME growth in 2025

      June 10, 2025
    • Yes, it’s great to get PR coverage – until it’s locked behind a bloody paywall

      June 10, 2025
    • We have to act now to keep AI from becoming a far-left Trojan Horse

      June 10, 2025
    • SME lending delays slashed by 80% thanks to fintech-driven back-office reform

      June 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,174)
    • Investing (2,021)
    • Politics (15,580)
    • Stocks (3,138)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved