Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Federal Versus State Policies

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025
Federal Versus State Policies

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
WeightWatchers pivots from diets to drugs in UK partnership with anti-obesity treatment provider CheqUp
next post
New book exposes how top Biden comms staffer was ‘tip of the spear’ covering up Biden’s cognitive decline

You may also like

Illegal Alien Voting Isn’t Swaying Federal Elections

April 22, 2024

H-1B Visa Lottery Results Announced: Three-Quarters Rejected

May 1, 2024

Pharmaceutical Pricing Around the World

September 27, 2024

The CBO Budget and Economic Outlook: Debt Projected...

February 8, 2024

New Defending Globalization Content: The Conservative and Progressive...

May 30, 2024

Courts Should Affirm First Amendment Rights of Youths...

April 1, 2024

Questioning the Housing Crisis: Crisis or Consumer Preference?

December 12, 2024

Charting Some of Industrial Policy’s Opportunity Costs

June 8, 2023

National Security Implications of Unsustainable Spending and Debt

July 27, 2023

Trade in Real Life: How the FDA Burns...

July 3, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

      May 22, 2025
    • House GOP leadership takes victory lap after passing Trump’s ‘one big, beautiful bill’

      May 22, 2025
    • Republicans look to stop China’s ‘backdoor’ tariff dodging scheme

      May 22, 2025
    • MACD + ADX: Spot the Pullbacks Worth Trading

      May 22, 2025
    • SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

      May 22, 2025
    • New book exposes how top Biden comms staffer was ‘tip of the spear’ covering up Biden’s cognitive decline

      May 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,031)
    • Investing (1,978)
    • Politics (15,349)
    • Stocks (3,098)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved