Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Don’t Count on Tariff Revenue to Cover the “One Big Beautiful Bill”

by May 27, 2025
May 27, 2025
Don’t Count on Tariff Revenue to Cover the “One Big Beautiful Bill”

Scott Lincicome

In the May 26 Washington Post, I provide six reasons why—contra the White House spin—Republicans can’t and shouldn’t count on President Donald Trump’s new tariffs to provide a steady stream of federal revenue to offset the 10-year cost of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that just passed the House of Representatives:

Because all the tariffs were implemented via executive action, the next president could reduce or eliminate them as quickly as Trump imposed them, just as President Joe Biden did to some of the tariffs Trump imposed unilaterally during his first term.
Because the largest tariffs were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act on dubious legal grounds, an adverse court ruling in one of the several pending lawsuits would mean trillions less in revenue, and it could come in as little as 18 months. (For more on these legal challenges, check out today’s Cato event on the same subject.)
Trump himself will likely change the tariffs’ scope and application, as he has already done in recent trade deals with the UK and China and other deals during his first term. As long as tariffs are a bargaining chip, they can’t be considered reliable government revenue.
The administration also will likely exclude various products from the tariffs, as it’s already done for goods that qualify for the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement and consumer electronics (and also during Trump 1.0).
As almost all economists agree, the tariffs will reduce economic growth and thus offset much, if not all, of the increase in GDP caused by the OBBB’s tax cuts. Just as tax cuts can stimulate economic activity and boost future government revenue, Trump’s tariffs will have the exact opposite effect.
High and variable tariffs will encourage private parties to reduce or evade these taxes by rearranging their supply chains, exploiting legal loopholes, or smuggling. Various estimates show that these actions reduced US tariff revenue by billions of dollars during Trump’s first term, and economists expect even larger losses this time around. (Indeed, it’s already happening.)

Congress should pursue tax reform, but it should do so honestly by closing loopholes and cutting federal spending. My Cato colleagues Adam Michel, Romina Boccia, and others have provided several excellent ideas in this regard. For good reason, however, none of those ideas involve tariffs.

You can read the entire Washington Post piece here.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
What Is Copy Trading and How T4Trade Makes It Work for You
next post
FBI reopening investigation into cocaine found at Biden White House

You may also like

Seven Emergency Spending Reforms Congress Should Consider

February 5, 2024

Native-Born Americans Are Not Losing Jobs to Foreigners

February 13, 2025

Efficient, Timely and Reliable: A Framework for Election...

March 5, 2024

The Return of Blasphemy and Sacrilege Laws in...

January 23, 2024

School Districts Sue Over the “Nuisance” of Online...

May 10, 2023

Government Funding Bill Continues Irresponsible Status Quo as...

March 14, 2025

A Setback for Election Reformers?

November 20, 2024

Federal Debt vs. State Debt

October 26, 2023

A Prelude to New FTC Scrutiny of Occupational...

March 4, 2025

The Costs of Mask Mandates

September 9, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Russia, China, North Korea condemn Trump’s $175 billion Golden Dome missile shield

      May 27, 2025
    • Dems drop $20M on bizarre ‘American men’ strategy plan study in effort to dig out of 2024 political hole

      May 27, 2025
    • Immigration is Good, Just Like Trade

      May 27, 2025
    • Jasmine Crockett shares bizarre song clip calling herself ‘leader of the future’

      May 27, 2025
    • GOP Georgia Senate candidate targets vulnerable Jon Ossoff in ad depicting transgender ‘fan’

      May 27, 2025
    • What is a Crypto Hedge Fund and How Does It Work?

      May 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,066)
    • Investing (1,989)
    • Politics (15,381)
    • Stocks (3,108)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved