Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

London AI firm claims Getty copyright lawsuit is an ‘existential threat’ to generative tech industry

by June 10, 2025
June 10, 2025
London AI firm claims Getty copyright lawsuit is an ‘existential threat’ to generative tech industry

A landmark legal battle has begun in the UK High Court that could redefine the boundaries between copyright law and artificial intelligence innovation.

Stability AI, the London-based company behind the popular image generator Stable Diffusion, has warned that Getty Images’ copyright and trademark lawsuit poses “an overt threat” to the future of the generative AI industry.

Getty Images, one of the world’s largest and most influential photography agencies, alleges that Stability illegally used its vast database of copyrighted photographs to train its AI model — a claim the tech firm vehemently denies. At the heart of the case is the allegation that Stability’s technology outputs images that still bear Getty’s watermark, leading the agency to describe the result as tantamount to “sticking our trademark on pornography” and “AI rubbish”.

Lawyers for Getty argue that this is not a fight between art and innovation, but one about fair payment and responsible technology development. “The problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment,” said Lindsay Lane KC, representing Getty. “This was a bunch of tech geeks who were so excited by AI that they were indifferent to any of the dangers or problems it presents.”

Stability AI, whose board includes film director James Cameron, hit back by claiming Getty is using “fanciful” legal arguments and spending upwards of £10 million in an attempt to derail a technology it perceives as an existential threat to its own business model. The company also strongly rejected Getty’s separate allegation that it had trained on databases containing child sexual abuse material (CSAM), calling the claim “repugnant” and insisting it has robust safeguards in place to prevent abuse.

The case opens at a time of growing tension between generative AI firms and the creative industries, as photographers, musicians and writers warn that AI tools are increasingly trained on their work without consent or compensation. Recent campaigns backed by stars including Elton John and Dua Lipa have called for tighter copyright protections and regulatory reform.

In the UK, the debate has reached Westminster, where a proposed government policy would force copyright holders to opt out of having their material used to train AI models — a move widely criticised by creators and rights holders who argue that “opting in” should be the default.

“Getty Images, of course, recognises that the AI industry overall may be a force for good,” said Lane. “But that doesn’t justify allowing those developing AI models to ride roughshod over intellectual property rights.”

The trial, which is expected to last several weeks, will involve testimony from leading academics and AI experts, including specialists from the University of California, Berkeley and Germany’s University of Freiberg. More than 78,000 pages of evidence have been submitted, including examples of Getty-owned images allegedly used in the training process — such as portraits of Donald Glover, Jürgen Klopp and Christopher Nolan.

With the outcome likely to set precedent not just in the UK but globally, the case is being closely watched by tech companies, artists, and lawmakers alike. The stakes are high: a ruling in Getty’s favour could impose new restrictions on how AI companies source their training data, while a win for Stability could embolden the sector to continue training on publicly accessible materials.

Either way, the outcome will likely shape the future of content creation — and the fine line between inspiration, imitation, and intellectual property in the age of AI.

Read more:
London AI firm claims Getty copyright lawsuit is an ‘existential threat’ to generative tech industry

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
UK wage growth slows and unemployment rises to four-year high
next post
Social media creators to eclipse traditional media in global ad revenue for first time

You may also like

How to Set Up an Ecommerce Merchant Account

March 1, 2024

Getting to Know You: Amy Knight, Co-Founder of...

August 5, 2024

JD Wetherspoon see rising sales rise but warn...

November 8, 2023

The Top Trends in E-commerce 2023

July 6, 2023

Carbon Footprint Calculators – An Essential Tool For...

January 17, 2023

British Driverless Car Start-Up Secures $1 Billion Funding

May 7, 2024

UK housing market poised for buoyant autumn as...

July 15, 2024

YouMusic AI: Create AI Music for Free (2024)

October 30, 2024

Nearly half of Brits want to start or...

April 29, 2024

Respect the menopause or be sued for disability...

February 22, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Schumer forces name change for ‘big, beautiful bill’ moments before it passes

      July 1, 2025
    • ‘Only the beginning’: Trump admin releases data showing federal workforce slashed since January

      July 1, 2025
    • House Republicans call for investigation into Obama-appointed judge in Trump funding case

      July 1, 2025
    • Tax cuts, work requirements and asylum fees: Here’s what’s inside the Senate’s version of Trump’s bill

      July 1, 2025
    • House kicks off final sprint for Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ with key committee hearing

      July 1, 2025
    • Why Justice Jackson is a fish out of water on the Supreme Court

      July 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,354)
    • Investing (2,092)
    • Politics (15,904)
    • Stocks (3,181)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved