Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should Government Fund Public Broadcasting?

by June 13, 2025
June 13, 2025
Should Government Fund Public Broadcasting?

Jeffrey Miron

On May 27, NPR, Aspen Public Radio, Colorado Public Radio, and KSUT Public Radio filed a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order that would cancel all federal support for public media.

The lawsuit argues that the order violates the First Amendment and the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, which prevents federal agencies from controlling the CPB. The CPB distributes federal funds to local public radio and television stations.

We set aside whether a president or only Congress can cancel federal funding for CPB and instead address whether such funding is good policy. Our answer is no.

The main reason is that such funding is inconsistent with the First Amendment. Any government policy or program has a viewpoint, but funding television and radio broadcasting is especially problematic, since government financing inevitably subsidizes some perspectives over others. Even a formally ‘neutral’ grant process cannot escape this effect: public money sustains the editorial judgments of the recipients and leaves rival voices to fend for themselves.

A second issue is that public funding is not a convincing response to any externality or public goods problem. This is separate from whether PBS programming is “good.” Let’s stipulate that it is. But so is any product that survives in the market. The question for government funding is whether the market will fail to provide a particular type of programming that is valuable.

No convincing argument exists for this view. A wide variety of news and media platforms cater to a diverse set of demands and viewpoints: Disney and Adult Swim for different age groups; The Atlantic and Fox News for different political demographics. So, assuming done in a constitutionally valid way, eliminating CPB funding is the right policy.

This is not to say CPB-backed stations should disappear, only that they should compete on the same footing as other outlets. NPR, PBS, and their affiliates can—and already do—attract listener donations, corporate underwriting, foundation grants, and digital subscription revenue. Freed from federal appropriations, they would retain full editorial independence while sparing taxpayers the cost and constitutional headaches that accompany government patronage of the press.

This article appeared on Substack on June 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
PPE Medpro legal battle intensifies as civil servant admits approval ‘mistake’ over sterile gowns
next post
‘War criminal Netanyahu’: ‘Squad’ members erupt over Israel’s ‘reckless’ strike on Iran

You may also like

Addressing Foreign Assaults on American Expression and Innovation:...

December 18, 2024

Election Policy Roundup

October 31, 2024

Anatomy of China’s Housing Crisis: Ending Financial Repression

November 14, 2023

Spotlighting Protester Surveillance: FOIA Lawsuit Edition

May 2, 2023

Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

June 27, 2025

House Budget Committee Seeks to Reform Emergency Spending...

July 24, 2024

New IRS Guidance Makes the Inflation Reduction Act’s...

May 31, 2024

Senate Letter Expresses Doubts on US Security Guarantees...

October 4, 2023

Pathways and Possible Solutions to the US Fiscal...

December 13, 2024

Trump Attempts Price Controls on Prescription Drugs

May 12, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Iran regime escalates repression toward ‘North Korea-style model of isolation and control’

      July 4, 2025
    • UK revealed as Europe’s worst country for commuters in new ranking

      July 4, 2025
    • This July 4th, a family waits: American hostage’s father pleads for son’s freedom from Hamas terrorists

      July 4, 2025
    • $88m methane-tracking satellite lost in space, dealing major blow to climate monitoring

      July 4, 2025
    • New US visa rules will force foreign students to unlock social media profiles

      July 4, 2025
    • The real Formula 1: British Grand Prix highlights UK’s £16bn motorsport economy

      July 4, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,393)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,945)
    • Stocks (3,189)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved