Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise

by June 16, 2025
June 16, 2025
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has come under mounting pressure from devolved governments after being accused of underfunding Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the wake of her decision to increase employer national insurance contributions (NICs).

The 1.2% rise in NICs for employers on salaries above £5,000, introduced on 6 April, is being covered by the Treasury in England through direct funding. However, for the devolved administrations, Reeves has chosen to apply the Barnett formula to calculate their allocations — a move that has sparked widespread criticism.

Although the formula adjusts funding based on population size, it does not account for the significantly larger public sectors operated by Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast. Finance ministers in each of the devolved nations say they have been left with substantial shortfalls and have accused the UK government of breaching the UK’s own Statement of Funding Policy, which prevents one administration from taking actions that financially disadvantage the others.

In Wales, the funding gap is around £72 million annually. Welsh finance secretary Mark Drakeford confirmed the government would take £36 million from reserves to cover half the cost but warned that the remainder — to be borne by local authorities and public bodies — would mean cuts of around 14%. “We have made our position very clear with the Treasury that using the Barnett formula in this instance is a breach of the rules,” Drakeford said. “If this was a one-off, we may have been able to use more of our reserves, but as it is, this will unfairly impact Wales year after year.”

Scotland is facing a significantly larger bill, estimated at £700 million, with the Treasury offering only £339 million in additional funding. In Northern Ireland, where the shortfall is around £200 million, £146 million has been allocated — still well short of the amount needed to meet public sector obligations.

Scottish finance secretary Shona Robison has repeatedly called for the tax rise to be reversed or fully funded. “Failing that,” she said, “we have asked that they fully fund this tax increase to ensure Scotland’s NHS, councils and other public services don’t lose out on vital revenue. It feels like Scotland is now being punished for having decided to employ more people in the public sector and to invest in key public services.”

Northern Ireland’s civil service, operating under long-term financial constraints, has also raised concerns that the Treasury’s contribution does not reflect the true costs facing a devolved administration with one of the highest proportions of public sector workers in the UK.

A Treasury spokesperson defended the government’s position, insisting that the approach was in line with “agreed funding arrangements and longstanding precedent”.

But the decision has reopened debate over whether the Barnett formula, first introduced in 1978 as a temporary fix, remains suitable for a modern devolved UK. Critics say the formula fails to reflect real needs and costs — particularly for nations like Wales and Scotland that rely more heavily on public sector employment.

The row also threatens to deepen a growing divide within the Labour Party. While Labour holds power at Westminster and in Wales, tensions between Welsh Labour and the UK government have intensified. Recent polling suggests Welsh Labour is trailing behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK in the run-up to next year’s Senedd elections, with only 18% support — a shock result that puts pressure on First Minister Eluned Morgan to demonstrate greater independence from the party’s national leadership.

As the cost of living crisis continues and public services come under growing strain, the funding dispute over national insurance could become a flashpoint in both intergovernmental relations and Labour’s internal cohesion.

Read more:
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Setting global standards for family-friendly working: UK and Australian employers unite at Australia House
next post
Getting to know you: Dr Rashmi Mantri, Founder Director, British Youth International College (BYITC) Supermaths

You may also like

CMA Launches Probe into Nationwide’s £2.9bn Takeover of...

May 31, 2024

Mid-year slump in business confidence confirmed by July...

July 31, 2023

Key Factors to Consider When Applying for Investment...

August 17, 2023

Labour’s Access to Work reform plans ‘risk excluding...

June 5, 2025

HMRC offers month long extension over new customs...

September 22, 2022

Britishvolt owed £160m at its collapse

March 15, 2023

Forex Trading UK for Beginners

May 7, 2025

Top 5 UK Property Features Buyers Want

April 17, 2025

Tesla sales plunge 49% across Europe in April...

May 28, 2025

New car sales continue to rise in Northern...

May 5, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Data Security Posture Management – The Next Big Data Solution Your Business Needs (And How to Get Started)

      July 7, 2025
    • Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

      July 7, 2025
    • Over 158 million Americans voted in 2024 as Trump reclaimed the White House

      July 7, 2025
    • US ends terrorist designation of Syrian militant leaders

      July 7, 2025
    • Haitian Immigrants Have a Low Incarceration Rate

      July 7, 2025
    • Sen. Steve Daines says regime change is the best long-term plan in Iran

      July 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,410)
    • Investing (2,105)
    • Politics (15,957)
    • Stocks (3,192)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved