Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Beyond the Finish Line: The Grand Teton Trail & the Grand Disconnect

by June 17, 2025
June 17, 2025
Beyond the Finish Line: The Grand Teton Trail & the Grand Disconnect

Mike Fox

As a former public defender, I know better than to confess to a crime. But recently, I found myself in a situation that perfectly illustrates how easily an ordinary person can stumble into legal trouble, even with the best intentions. My crime: walking my dog along the West Front Lawn of the US Capitol on Memorial Day.

What started as a pleasant stroll quickly turned into a perplexing predicament. The day before was the National Memorial Day Concert. On Memorial Day itself, with the concert over and most of the equipment cleared, it appeared the area had been reopened. So, I walked right in.

It wasn’t until I was well inside the perimeter, with no obvious way out, that I observed the signs indicating that the area was closed pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 1752: Restricted Building or Grounds. It appeared that the barricades containing these signs where I entered had been knocked down and pushed aside—perhaps by the workers breaking down the equipment—leading me to believe the area was accessible. I had no idea I was breaking the law.

The bad news: A harmless infraction like this could land someone up to a year in jail. The good news for me, however, lies in a crucial legal detail: 18 U.S. Code § 1752 includes an intent element, or mens rea. Specifically, the statute requires that one “knowingly enter or remain.” My defense is clear: I had no notice—hence no intent to violate the law.

My experience immediately brought to mind the plight of Michelino Sunseri, whose case I’ve been involved with over the past few months. Like me, Sunseri had no actual notice that he was committing a crime. But here’s the critical difference: the regulation he was charged under was never passed by Congress and—even worse—contained no intent element. This means that Sunseri didn’t have the benefit of the doubt I might have.

Sunseri’s case highlights a troubling conflict. On one side, fortunately, the Department of the Interior is now attempting to follow President Trump’s Executive Order aimed at combating overcriminalization, specifically the proliferation of criminalization by regulation, which Sunseri fell victim to. On the other hand, you have federal prosecutors who, like Ariel Calmes and Nicole Romine, prioritize persecuting decent people over seeking justice. Their relentless pursuit of Sunseri is emblematic of the massive disconnect between the letter and spirit of the law and the unchecked power of unaccountable prosecutors. This fosters an environment where individuals can be blindsided by regulations they had no reasonable way of knowing about, and without the crucial safeguard of the government having to prove intent.

Thankfully, there’s traction in Congress to confront these issues. Last week, the House Judiciary Committee advanced two significant pieces of legislation: the Count the Crimes to Cut Act and the Mens Rea Reform Act. These bills offer real hope for ordinary people like Sunseri. They aim to rein in the ever-expanding list of federal crimes and, critically, ensure that individuals can’t be prosecuted for simply not knowing about an obscure rule or statute. They underscore the fundamental principle that to be found guilty, one should actually have known they were doing something wrong.

As we move forward, these reforms are essential to protecting everyday citizens from the unintended consequences of an ever-growing body of laws and the potential overreach of prosecutorial power. Because no one should face jail time for an innocent walk in the park or run up a mountain.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump’s stance against Iran nuclear ambitions backed by vast majority of Americans: poll
next post
‘It just baffles me’: Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill

You may also like

A Limited‐​Government Answer to Pregnancy and Childbirth?

May 3, 2023

Bank Capital Standards

July 3, 2025

Why Legal Immigration Is Impossible for Nearly Everyone

June 13, 2023

Could Policymakers Improve Youth Online Safety Without Running...

December 5, 2024

Committee Testimony on Immigration and Threats to Law...

December 12, 2024

Policymakers Won’t Cool It on Protectionism

July 27, 2023

Great Moments in “Buy America”

July 21, 2023

Trying to “Bring Back” Manufacturing Jobs Is a...

April 21, 2025

Responding to Trump’s Credit Card Restriction Proposal

September 24, 2024

American Compass Dystopia: Americans’ “Stagnant” Income

July 20, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • ThinCats hits record lending levels with £381m despite challenging UK business climate

      July 8, 2025
    • Flight of the non-doms: how worried should Labour be about the super‑rich leaving the UK?

      July 8, 2025
    • UK house prices stall in June as stamp duty change and weak economy hit confidence

      July 8, 2025
    • Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally’s third party push

      July 8, 2025
    • Data Security Posture Management – The Next Big Data Solution Your Business Needs (And How to Get Started)

      July 7, 2025
    • Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

      July 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,413)
    • Investing (2,105)
    • Politics (15,958)
    • Stocks (3,192)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved