Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

New Report Analyzing Meta’s Oversight Board Finds Mixed Impact in Advancing Free Expression

by June 18, 2025
June 18, 2025
New Report Analyzing Meta’s Oversight Board Finds Mixed Impact in Advancing Free Expression

David Inserra

I recently published a working paper that examines the effectiveness of Meta’s Oversight Board in driving pro-expression norms and principles by analyzing over 100 Board cases. Overall, I find that the Board has had mixed results in advancing free expression on Meta’s platforms.

This outcome was not what I would have expected if you had asked me five years ago. Back then, I was working on Meta’s content policy team, and I signed up to support the newly established Board because I felt that creating a diverse team of thinkers to protect free expression could only improve the content moderation decisions being made not only by Meta, but even the broader Trust and Safety community. I hoped that the Board, free from the Silicon Valley monoculture, immune to the considerations of advertising boycotts, and with a better—though certainly not perfect—balance of perspectives, would challenge prevailing norms that restricted important political or social speech, leading to more open expression online. 

However, my research reveals that the Board’s impact is that it protected expression in some places but restricted it in others. Specifically, I found that the Board advanced expression through its ability to find errors in Meta’s content moderation. The Board has rectified errors in dozens of cases, mostly to restore speech. But while this has improved expression, it’s still fixing a tiny fraction of the total number of errors referred to the Board and an even smaller fraction of the total number of errors made by Meta. 

The Board has also improved expression through its efforts to improve clarity and transparency in Meta’s policies. Improvements to transparency can help users better understand and follow Meta’s rules and avoid having content removed. But not all transparency recommendations lead to meaningful changes. 

But the Board’s biggest opportunity to expand expression—creating broad norms for free expression in content policies—has been far more mixed. In those cases that were focused on setting policy norms, about 60 percent expanded expression and 40 percent restricted expression. But those decisions to restrict expression were generally made more forcefully and set more far-reaching precedents. 

Furthermore, the Board’s decisions have not protected expression equally. When the Board took cases with left-coded speech, such content was allowed to remain online 90 percent of the time, while right-coded speech was allowed 41 percent of the time. The inconsistency in protecting speech, especially for certain viewpoints, is a problem for an organization conceived as a protector of expression online. 

In sum, my working paper shows that while the Board has had some success in fixing mistakes and improving transparency, the Board has not successfully been a consistent advocate for expression in its decisions and norms.

I offer several ideas for how the Board might reform itself, including a greater emphasis on free expression in future Board members and the Board staff, making it harder to pass speech-restrictive recommendations, or even pushing for greater user controls. Of course, it is up to the Board and Meta to decide what policies govern their platforms, free from government coercion or regulation. But we would all benefit from the Board doing more to strengthen a culture of free expression online. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Iran warns US joining conflict would mean ‘all-out war,’ refuses demands to give up disputed nuclear program
next post
In Iran’s ‘forever war’ against the US, regime has targeted and killed Americans worldwide

You may also like

States May Liberalize CPA Licensing

October 9, 2024

David Boaz, RIP: Reflections on a Great Libertarian,...

June 7, 2024

College Cost Reduction Act: More Downsizing Needed

February 5, 2024

When Property Owners Lose the Right to Exclude,...

February 16, 2024

Congress Should Fix the Nanny Tax

January 18, 2024

Three Reasons to Be Very Skeptical of U.S....

June 20, 2023

The High Cost of War: Ukraine Aid Could...

April 9, 2024

Including Emergency Spending in Fiscal Projections Distorts the...

April 25, 2024

US Citizens Were 80.2 Percent of Crossers with...

August 8, 2024

A Case for Deficit Reduction

April 19, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump Clashes With Reporter Over Tariffs, Citing Pandemic and ‘Fighting Lunatics’

      August 1, 2025
    • Longtime Biden aide testifies he stood to earn up to $8M had president won re-election

      August 1, 2025
    • Secret Service must ‘course correct’ after alleged smuggling episode on Trump trip, former agent says

      August 1, 2025
    • GOP senators rally around effort to end ‘radical wokeness’ in HHS task force

      July 31, 2025
    • Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands

      July 31, 2025
    • Homesick GOP senators mull throwing out the rules over stonewalling Dems

      July 31, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,637)
    • Investing (2,165)
    • Politics (16,271)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved