Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Unhinged Reactions: Federal Lands Edition

by June 20, 2025
June 20, 2025
Unhinged Reactions: Federal Lands Edition

Stephen Slivinski

There are a few safe bets on outrageous online reactions to proposed government policies. Unhinged hyperventilation over very modest proposals to sell federal land seems to be one of them.

A recent proposal by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources directs the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service to auction off a combined 1 to 1.5 percent of federally owned land to private owners for the express purpose of building new housing in 11 western states.

To see the overheated reaction from opponents, you’d think the committee was proposing to build casinos along the rim of the Grand Canyon and Olive Gardens in Yellowstone. There was pearl-grasping over the perceived acreage (“It’s equal to the size of Connecticut!”) and revulsion over transferring ownership rights of federally owned land to private owners (“This land is our birthright!”).

The proposal is indeed modest: as noted already, it’s no more than 1.5 percent of what is currently federally owned land in 11 of the 20 largest states in the US. Together, those states equal 1.7 million square miles. Tiny Connecticut amounts to 0.3 percent of that 11-state landmass.

Assuming the feds max out this allotment (which they are not required to do), there’s a rather lengthy multi-year process to sell the land, including getting approval from the state and local governments (including tribal governments if applicable) where each parcel is located. 

And that’s the big myth in all of this: these are not beautiful national parks with breathtaking vistas. This is mostly land in the hands of the Bureau of Land Management, the agency that oversees the purchase and management of land that, when the bureau was created in 1946, was described as “the land nobody wanted.”

Plus, the land has to be deemed suitable for housing development, specifically, as determined by the aforementioned process and prioritizing attributes such as being adjacent to already developed areas and having access to existing infrastructure.

This isn’t the first time such a proposal has been put forward—or, for that matter, been enacted. There’s a version of this that has already been in place in the geographic zones along the outskirts of Las Vegas for most of the past 30 years. That one was also designed specifically to increase the land available to build new housing, and, unlike this proposal, which requires the land to be sold at market price, that land was to be sold at a discount.

The author of that proposal? Well-known fire-breathing free-market radical Sen. Harry Reid (D‑NV).

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Friday Feature: Academy of Creatives
next post
Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team are weighing next steps on Iran

You may also like

Nonprofit Tax Code Weaponization Alert

May 1, 2024

Unfortunately, as I Warned Lawmakers in March, We...

December 28, 2023

Increased Medicaid Coverage Is Not Improving Low Birth...

June 13, 2023

The Libertarian behind the World’s First Freedom of...

May 23, 2023

Pharmaceutical Pricing Around the World

May 14, 2025

America’s Not-So-Secret Secret Police

August 7, 2025

Navigating the Future of International Taxation: A New...

February 13, 2024

The OECD Plan to Increase Taxes Costs More...

September 19, 2023

Defense Spending Can and Should Be Cut

May 21, 2024

Friday Feature: Incubate Debate

June 6, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • James Comer praises Kash Patel for ‘holding deep state accountable’ as FBI raids John Bolton’s home

      August 22, 2025
    • From Tariff Shock to Mild Sting: How the EU Deal Could Affect Drug Prices for Patients

      August 22, 2025
    • New Court Decision Out of Portugal Shows How Essential Section 230 Is to a Free Internet

      August 22, 2025
    • Government to appeal High Court ruling forcing closure of Epping migrant hotel

      August 22, 2025
    • Trump DOJ to begin handing over Epstein files to House Oversight investigators

      August 22, 2025
    • OnlyFans pays record £520m to Ukrainian-born owner as $8bn sale looms

      August 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,855)
    • Investing (2,233)
    • Politics (16,460)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved