Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Unhinged Reactions: Federal Lands Edition

by June 20, 2025
June 20, 2025
Unhinged Reactions: Federal Lands Edition

Stephen Slivinski

There are a few safe bets on outrageous online reactions to proposed government policies. Unhinged hyperventilation over very modest proposals to sell federal land seems to be one of them.

A recent proposal by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources directs the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service to auction off a combined 1 to 1.5 percent of federally owned land to private owners for the express purpose of building new housing in 11 western states.

To see the overheated reaction from opponents, you’d think the committee was proposing to build casinos along the rim of the Grand Canyon and Olive Gardens in Yellowstone. There was pearl-grasping over the perceived acreage (“It’s equal to the size of Connecticut!”) and revulsion over transferring ownership rights of federally owned land to private owners (“This land is our birthright!”).

The proposal is indeed modest: as noted already, it’s no more than 1.5 percent of what is currently federally owned land in 11 of the 20 largest states in the US. Together, those states equal 1.7 million square miles. Tiny Connecticut amounts to 0.3 percent of that 11-state landmass.

Assuming the feds max out this allotment (which they are not required to do), there’s a rather lengthy multi-year process to sell the land, including getting approval from the state and local governments (including tribal governments if applicable) where each parcel is located. 

And that’s the big myth in all of this: these are not beautiful national parks with breathtaking vistas. This is mostly land in the hands of the Bureau of Land Management, the agency that oversees the purchase and management of land that, when the bureau was created in 1946, was described as “the land nobody wanted.”

Plus, the land has to be deemed suitable for housing development, specifically, as determined by the aforementioned process and prioritizing attributes such as being adjacent to already developed areas and having access to existing infrastructure.

This isn’t the first time such a proposal has been put forward—or, for that matter, been enacted. There’s a version of this that has already been in place in the geographic zones along the outskirts of Las Vegas for most of the past 30 years. That one was also designed specifically to increase the land available to build new housing, and, unlike this proposal, which requires the land to be sold at market price, that land was to be sold at a discount.

The author of that proposal? Well-known fire-breathing free-market radical Sen. Harry Reid (D‑NV).

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Friday Feature: Academy of Creatives
next post
Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team are weighing next steps on Iran

You may also like

The War on Prices Continues: Biden’s Misguided Rent...

April 1, 2024

STATES Act 2.0 Would Make the Federal Government...

December 8, 2023

Does Capturing Drug Kingpins Reduce Violence?

August 8, 2024

Trump’s Tariffs Undermine His Tax Cuts

June 27, 2024

The Executive Order on Accreditation in Higher Education...

April 24, 2025

Will AI Cause Unemployment?

December 4, 2023

What Does OPEC Do and Should We Care?

November 2, 2023

Disbarment, Attorney Discipline, and Occupational Licensing

June 20, 2023

I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It...

June 6, 2025

Presidents Can’t Overhaul Election Law by Decree

March 26, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • WATCH: Trump says he is hopeful Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud

      August 1, 2025
    • Trump moves nuclear submarines weeks after praising sub’s power in Iran strikes

      August 1, 2025
    • Recess on ice as Republicans hunker down for high-stakes nominee blitz

      August 1, 2025
    • Iran says it has ‘plenty of scientists’ left to restart uranium enrichment, despite US, Israeli strikes

      August 1, 2025
    • No, Tariffs Are Not Similar to Consumption Taxes Like a VAT

      August 1, 2025
    • Trump repositions 2 nuclear submarines after ‘highly provocative’ Russian comments

      August 1, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,651)
    • Investing (2,168)
    • Politics (16,281)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved