Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Warren, Trump, and the Debt Limit

by June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025
Warren, Trump, and the Debt Limit

Jeffrey Miron

In a rare twist, Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump agree on one thing: the United States should repeal the federal debt limit. They have a good point; the debt limit is an ineffective “solution” to a real but oft-mischaracterized problem.

That problem is not the debt per se. Any economic entity—whether a consumer, business, or government—can sensibly take on debt to finance expenditure, assuming the entity has reasonable prospects of repaying the debt. This might occur if the borrowing finances the purchase of a durable asset, such as a house, or finances investment in new plant and equipment that pays a future return or pays for a war that is vital to a country’s survival.

The problem for the United States is that, under current policies, the federal government cannot plausibly pay for the projected path of future expenditure. Current estimates suggest that entitlement spending—on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare—will grow significantly faster than the economy on average, implying the US will eventually spend all or more of its GDP on these programs. That cannot actually occur; before that point, the country will experience a fiscal meltdown. Tax increases can postpone this reckoning for only a limited period, because higher and higher tax rates will slow economic growth.

A debt limit makes sense, therefore, only if it slows the path of federal expenditure.

But that effect of a debt limit is unlikely. Faced with a binding constraint, Congress can increase the official limit, as it has done 78 times since 1960.

Politicians play this game because having an official limit appears to promote fiscal responsibility without the pain of limiting expenditure. The same applies for balanced budget amendments and spending caps; these also pretend that rules can promote fiscal balance while avoiding explicit discussion of expenditure. These approaches plausibly harm fiscal balance by providing a false sense of security.

Thus, Trump and Warren have it right: repeal the debt limit and focus policy debates where they belong, on excessive expenditure.

This article appeared on Substack on June 24, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Russian official says Moscow has ‘no intention’ of supplying Iran with warheads, following Trump taunts
next post
Louisiana mom warns ‘half of what we’re working for’ at risk if Trump’s budget bill fails

You may also like

There’s Nothing “Absurd” or “Dangerous” about Ending the...

July 22, 2024

The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a...

November 7, 2024

Decision on Menthol Ban Delayed Until March 2024

December 6, 2023

Congress Takes One Step Closer to a TikTok...

March 8, 2024

House Budget Committee Seeks to Reform Emergency Spending...

July 24, 2024

Three Reasons Americans Should Be Concerned about the...

April 28, 2023

Book Review: The Menace of Fiscal QE

June 26, 2023

Friday Feature: Masterpiece Academy

June 28, 2024

Facing the 2025 Fiscal Cliff: Reduce Deficits with...

November 19, 2024

ProPublica Profiles Army Corps Failures

November 17, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • House Democrats call on Rubio to allow injured children from Gaza into US following visa halt

      August 27, 2025
    • SkyWater pitches itself as all-American firm as Trump mulls more equity deals following Intel deal

      August 27, 2025
    • 600,000 Chinese Students Would Be a Windfall for the United States

      August 26, 2025
    • EPA urged by state AGs to axe funds for ‘radical’ climate project accused of training judges

      August 26, 2025
    • ‘Doctor Strangelove with a mustache’: Bolton blasted for ‘profiteering’ off US secrets by White House advisor

      August 26, 2025
    • Bolton may be in hot water as FBI investigation expands beyond controversial book

      August 26, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,886)
    • Investing (2,242)
    • Politics (16,495)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved