Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Sweet or taxable? M&S strawberry sandwich sparks new VAT debate

by June 27, 2025
June 27, 2025
Sweet or taxable? M&S strawberry sandwich sparks new VAT debate

Marks & Spencer’s new strawberry and cream sandwich has captured attention on social media — but now it’s caught the eye of tax experts, too.

Marketed as a sweet take on the viral Japanese strawberry sando, M&S’s half-sandwich — part of its meal deal range — is prompting questions over whether it should be classified as a standard sandwich (zero-rated for VAT) or as a confectionery item (subject to 20 per cent VAT).

Wrapped in typical savoury packaging, the new snack consists of sweetened bread and a generous helping of strawberries and cream, mimicking the Japanese original made with soft milk bread. While shoppers are debating the flavour, accountants and barristers are debating its tax status.

“If the bread is sweetened and designed to be eaten with fingers, the case for classifying it as confectionery is surprisingly strong,” said Simon Knivett, VAT manager at HW Fisher. That would make the item subject to VAT under a 1988 change aimed at catching cereal bars and other “sweetened prepared foods”.

The legal uncertainty echoes the now-legendary VAT ruling on Jaffa Cakes, which saw McVitie’s successfully argue the treat was a cake — and therefore zero-rated — not a biscuit. Another similar case is currently unfolding over whether “mega marshmallows” should be taxed as confectionery, with London-based wholesaler Innovative Bites challenging HMRC’s decision to apply the full VAT rate.

Max Schofield, a barrister at Devereux Chambers, said the outcome of that case could have broader implications: “If giant marshmallows, because they’re eaten with fingers and are sweet, fall under confectionery rules, so could sweet sandwiches.”

Adam Craggs, a partner at law firm RPC, added: “The M&S strawberry sandwich may soon join the curious canon of VAT case law. The legislation is notoriously complex and often leads to outcomes that can feel arbitrary or absurd.”

M&S has not commented on whether the item is being sold with or without VAT applied, but with increased popularity — and online debate from VAT professionals — HMRC may soon have a decision to make.

As one tax commentator wryly observed on LinkedIn: “Anyone buying this monstrosity should be charged 100% VAT — just on principle.”

Read more:
Sweet or taxable? M&S strawberry sandwich sparks new VAT debate

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Starmer thanks business for footing tax bill
next post
Padel club boom sees 3,200 venues built in 2024 as global popularity accelerates

You may also like

Italian Waiters bid arrivederci to London as Visa...

April 10, 2024

Royal Mail Owner Ready to Accept Improved Offer...

May 16, 2024

Vodafone franchisee scandal prompts parliamentary support and calls...

July 3, 2025

How to repurpose your website to accommodate special...

December 29, 2022

Startup bank headed by Lord Mandelson raises £25m...

January 14, 2024

How can expense management software streamline your business’s...

January 11, 2023

Government and Ofgem act to rein in unscrupulous...

April 5, 2024

Investing in real estate for retirement: Strategies for...

March 29, 2023

How Job Hopping Can Make or Break Your...

November 28, 2022

How Therapy Can Support Your Personal Growth

February 20, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Johnson demands NARA turn over records related to Biden’s mental ‘decline’ amid Senate probe of ‘cover-up’

      July 17, 2025
    • White House pushes back forcefully on Epstein file criticism: ‘Asinine suggestion’

      July 17, 2025
    • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process

      July 17, 2025
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

      July 17, 2025
    • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns

      July 17, 2025
    • Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package

      July 17, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,510)
    • Investing (2,128)
    • Politics (16,098)
    • Stocks (3,217)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved