Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

CAFE Standards

by June 30, 2025
June 30, 2025
CAFE Standards

Peter Van Doren

Automobile fuel mileage standards (also known as Corporate Average Fuel Economy or CAFE standards) are back in the news. The Senate budget reconciliation bill (also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill) contains a provision to set the fines to $0 for violation of those standards, although the actual law is not repealed because it could not be under the rules that govern budget reconciliation.

CAFE should have ended a long time ago. The problem for which it was designed (consumer myopia) never existed. And its repurposing as climate change policy is inefficient and regressive. While the Senate provision may appear to be a clever strategy to “repeal” CAFE, it is just another round of environmental policy ping-pong that will be reversed by the next Democratic administration. 

First, some background. Enacted after the 1973–74 oil shock, CAFE was a political solution to a political problem: soaring oil prices. The standards were premised on the belief that consumers would not pay more for cars that used less fuel, even if the reduced fuel use more than paid for the extra initial cost of the more efficient vehicle. Instead, CAFE sought to force automakers to produce higher-mileage cars and thereby reduce fuel use despite the supposed myopia of consumers. Subsequent economic research has shown that consumers were not myopic. Consumers’ willingness to pay for higher mileage capability approximately equals the expected future fuel cost savings without government intervention.

Even though the original rationale for CAFE has been undermined by the evidence, CAFE lives on with a new purpose: climate change. Since the 2007 Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency that the EPA has the authority to regulate tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions, CAFE has become a tool for CO₂ emissions reduction.

But, as I have previously argued, CAFE is an inefficient and clumsy tool because it targets only one source of greenhouse gas emissions, and it does so indirectly. Directly taxing carbon emissions would much more effectively incentivize businesses and consumers to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. The indirect CAFE program costs the economy at least six times as much as a carbon tax that reduces emissions equivalently.

CAFE standards are less stringent for larger cars and light trucks. This has actually induced an increase in vehicle size and weight that has resulted in increased fatalities from collisions.

Many prefer CAFE standards because they believe that taxes on carbon emissions would be regressive, falling heavily on lower-income households. But CAFE places an even heavier burden on the low-income.

If reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a worthwhile goal, we should pursue policies that directly address the problem and utilize prices rather than regulation to reduce emissions. While the Senate provision to reduce fines to zero may seem to achieve this, it is too clever by half.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump signs order lifting sanctions on Syria
next post
Industry chiefs sound alarm over ‘horrific’ packaging tax threatening UK businesses

You may also like

Canada Took the Leap on Legal Weed—Five Years...

April 23, 2025

Overdose Prevention Centers Are Saving Lives—So Why Is...

February 19, 2025

Secret Deals, Endless Wars: The America First Betrayal...

June 13, 2025

The State of Student Loan Forgiveness: October 2024

October 17, 2024

June BLS Price Index Reports Do Not Support...

July 18, 2025

Tennessee Leads the Way in Removing Barriers to...

May 18, 2023

Psychedelic Legalization

July 3, 2025

The Pernicious Expansion of “Public Health”

June 26, 2024

An Encouraging Report on Overdose Deaths

September 18, 2024

Another Misguided US Attack on the World Trade...

March 28, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • ‘All the options’: GOP eyes cutting August recess to move dozens of Trump nominees stalled by Dems

      July 21, 2025
    • Randomized Controlled Trials of Medicare and Medicaid, Please

      July 21, 2025
    • Obama-era officials mum on allegations of ‘manufactured’ intelligence launching Trump-Russia probe

      July 21, 2025
    • Hunter Biden special counsel got ‘one resume’ from DOJ to help prosecute president’s son

      July 21, 2025
    • Iran will not give up nuclear enrichment, top official confirms in exclusive Fox News interview

      July 21, 2025
    • AOC slams progressive critics for ‘lying’ about her Iron Dome stance in defense bill fight

      July 21, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,536)
    • Investing (2,137)
    • Politics (16,145)
    • Stocks (3,222)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved