Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Diesel emissions lawyers face criticism over £76m ‘eye-watering’ legal bill

by July 16, 2025
July 16, 2025
Diesel emissions lawyers face criticism over £76m ‘eye-watering’ legal bill

Lawyers representing more than a million British motorists in the UK’s largest-ever diesel emissions claim have been accused of “over-lawyering” and racking up excessive fees totalling more than £76 million.

The class action, brought against a number of major vehicle manufacturers including Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Nissan, Renault, and Peugeot-Citroën, alleges the use of illegal “defeat devices” to cheat emissions tests, resulting in vehicles emitting more pollutants than advertised.

Leading the case for the claimants are London law firms Pogust Goodhead and Leigh Day, who represent the majority of the 1.5 million claimants. They argue that affected diesel vehicles were mis-sold to consumers and seek compensation on behalf of drivers.

But at a pre-trial costs hearing in the High Court this week, lawyers for the car manufacturers challenged the scale of the legal fees being forecast by the claimants’ side, describing them as “eye-watering”.

They told the court that the combined costs budget put forward by the claimant firms totalled £76.25 million, including £3.42 million already spent and a further £72.83 million in proposed spending.

Defence lawyers questioned the proportionality of the figure, especially given that two experienced lead law firms were managing the claim and that the case involves substantial commonality across the defendants.

“The court is entitled to expect to see significant economies of scale,” they argued. “That is plainly not reflected in the levels of costs claimed across the claimants’ budgets. On the contrary, the claimants anticipate deploying a similar level of resources to all of the separately represented defendant groups combined.”

They described the cost submissions as “clear evidence of over-lawyering”.

The full trial to determine liability is scheduled to begin in October. In a rare move, the court has also already set aside time in October 2026 to assess potential damages—though that hearing will not go ahead if the manufacturers are successful in defending the main claim.

A spokesperson for Pogust Goodhead defended the firm’s approach, saying that the defendants’ own costs were of a similar scale and that Pogust Goodhead’s share represented only a fraction of the total fees being claimed by all claimant firms.

Leigh Day declined to comment on the cost dispute.

The case forms part of a wider wave of litigation across Europe and the US following revelations that some carmakers used software to reduce emissions under test conditions, while real-world pollution levels were significantly higher. In the UK, this collective action could run into billions of pounds in potential payouts if successful.

With the October trial fast approaching, scrutiny over the costs of mass litigation—and the business models of firms leading group actions—has intensified. The outcome could set an important precedent for future environmental and consumer-related class actions in the UK.

Read more:
Diesel emissions lawyers face criticism over £76m ‘eye-watering’ legal bill

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Open letter calls for urgent Treasury Select Committee scrutiny over weakening of post-crisis financial protections
next post
Inflation rises to 16-month high as rate cut hopes fade

You may also like

Sunak Goes to Washington – but must come...

June 8, 2023

6 Important things to include in your Website

September 22, 2023

Bitcoin hits new all-time high near $111,000 as...

May 22, 2025

Boots snapped up by us private equity giant...

March 7, 2025

The Best Way to Launch Your New Brokerage...

August 9, 2023

Insolvencies surge to highest rates since financial crash...

August 2, 2022

Business confidence sees sharpest rise since 2020

April 17, 2023

Power, Water, and Resilience: A Q&A with David...

August 6, 2025

Workplace romance and potential HR issues: How to...

January 18, 2023

Why an all-in-one holistic approach to security is...

March 6, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • ‘Doctor Strangelove with a mustache’: Bolton blasted for ‘profiteering’ off US secrets by White House advisor

      August 26, 2025
    • EPA urged to axe funds for ‘radical’ climate project accused of training judges, state AGs rally

      August 26, 2025
    • Bolton may be in hot water as FBI investigation expands beyond controversial book

      August 26, 2025
    • New Cato Paper: Immigrants Cut Victimization Rates, Boost Crime Reporting

      August 26, 2025
    • ‘Dr. Strangelove with a mustache’: Bolton blasted for ‘profiteering’ off US secrets by White House advisor

      August 26, 2025
    • Fighter pilots take directions from AI in Pentagon’s groundbreaking test

      August 26, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,886)
    • Investing (2,241)
    • Politics (16,493)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved