Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Rubio bans overseas outposts commenting on foreign elections unless there’s ‘clear and compelling’ US interest

by July 17, 2025
July 17, 2025
Rubio bans overseas outposts commenting on foreign elections unless there’s ‘clear and compelling’ US interest

The State Department will now only weigh in on foreign elections when there is a ‘clear and compelling’ U.S. interest to do so, focusing on strategic significance over spreading democratic values. 

‘Consistent with the administration’s emphasis on national sovereignty, the Department will comment publicly on elections only when there is a clear and compelling U.S. foreign policy interest to do so,’ according to a new memo articulating Secretary Marco Rubio’s directive obtained by Fox News Digital. 

‘Messages should avoid opining on the fairness or integrity of an electoral process, its legitimacy, or the democratic values of the country in question.’

The memo, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, said the U.S. would ‘hold firm to its own democratic values and celebrate those values when other countries choose a similar path,’ but would continue relationships where ‘strategic interests align,’ instead of focusing on values. 

Overseas outposts can still post public messages congratulating the winner of an election without high-level signoff, unless the outcome is contested, but are instructed to focus on the ‘outcome of an election, not the process.’ 

If a bureau wants to post messages denouncing the process of an election, such as in the case of violence during voting or sham elections, they need a senior-level signoff from the bureau and such permissions will be ‘rare.’ 

 

‘DO use messaging on elections to advance a U.S. foreign policy goal,’ the memo read. ‘DON’T use it to promote an ideology.’ 

Those writing official statements are instructed to ask themselves, ‘Would the president say it?’ 

The U.S.’ view on an election is closely watched by opposition groups and human rights activitists, and sometimes defines whether a nation is sanctioned or granted foreign aid. 

In a speech in Saudi Arabia in May, President Donald Trump said the U.S. would refrain from telling other countries how to manage their domestic affairs, reorienting U.S. policy that prompted interventions across the Middle East for decades. 

But still, in some cases, Trump has weighed in on the affairs of other countries: last week he imposed a 50% tariff on Brazil due to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who prosecutors accuse of trying to overturn the 2022 election results in a violent coup plot. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
White House releases Trump health update after speculation over swollen legs, bruised hands
next post
Cato’s David Bier Testifies Before House Hearing on Immigration Parole and Deportation

You may also like

Israel turns tables on UN official claiming ‘genocide’...

May 16, 2025

Florida Gov. DeSantis mandates all state university systems...

January 4, 2023

Supreme Court appears wary of massive tax code...

December 6, 2023

BREAKING: Elon Musk Officially Owns Twitter – Immediately...

October 28, 2022

‘Unplanned’ actress: Pro-lifers care for babies before and...

January 20, 2023

Vice President Kamala Harris attempts to explain AI...

July 13, 2023

US, Panama ‘taking back’ canal from ‘China’s influence,’...

April 8, 2025

What To Do When the Director of National...

December 5, 2022

Tight-lipped House Dems still divided on Biden, leave...

July 9, 2024

Judge blocks Trump from placing 2,200 USAID workers...

February 8, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • White House pushes back forcefully on Epstein file criticism: ‘Asinine suggestion’

      July 17, 2025
    • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process

      July 17, 2025
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

      July 17, 2025
    • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns

      July 17, 2025
    • Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package

      July 17, 2025
    • Cato’s David Bier Testifies Before House Hearing on Immigration Parole and Deportation

      July 17, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,510)
    • Investing (2,128)
    • Politics (16,097)
    • Stocks (3,217)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved