Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Encouraging a Weaker US Dollar is Bad Economic Policy

by August 5, 2025
August 5, 2025
Encouraging a Weaker US Dollar is Bad Economic Policy

Jai Kedia

The US dollar (USD) is the world’s reserve currency and has served as a safe haven for investors from around the world. This status largely reflects the strength of the US economy and the relative stability of its goods, services, and financial markets. Yet the USD has lost roughly 8 percent of its value since the start of the Trump administration, and its response has been strangely enthusiastic.

President Trump has repeatedly expressed his support for “not a weak dollar but a weaker dollar,” adding that “you make a hell of a lot more money” with a weaker USD. But this is just another example of economic shortsightedness. Like the bad economics displayed across many of the administration’s other proposals, this policy ignores knock-on and secondary effects. Yes, in a vacuum, a weaker dollar could benefit some market participants, such as large US-based multinational corporations (MNCs) whose goods become cheaper for foreign purchasers. But this benefit ignores negative spillover effects.

Money held by consumers in the US will lose some of its value, especially when buying imported goods. This will exert more inflationary pressure, which could mean further monetary tightening. If consumers see their real wealth reduced from an erosion of the value of their dollars, their demand for goods, including domestic products, will drop—hurting the very MNCs that the ‘weak dollar’ policy is supposed to help.

Another aspect that is ignored by solely focusing on exporters is the jeopardy to the USD’s status as the world’s reserve currency. The USD and financial products denominated in dollars, such as Treasury securities or corporate bonds, are the safe asset of choice for investors from around the world. The benefit to the US is that private firms and the government alike can rely on such demand to fund their usual operations and projects. If foreign investors are concerned about losing money when exchanging their own currencies for the USD, their appetite for US financial products could fall, lowering US asset prices.

An analysis of the stock market’s performance in relation to the USD confirms that the transmission of a weak dollar to corporate profits is not straightforward. Figure 1 shows the annual percentage change in the dollar’s real value compared with the stock market’s inflation-adjusted performance over the same period for every year from 2007 to 2024. The value of the dollar is measured using the Real Broad Dollar Index collected by FRED. The S&P 500 is used as a proxy to measure the value of large-cap US corporations. As the graph shows, fluctuations in the dollar’s purchasing power are seldom correlated with large-cap corporate performance. Yes, on average, a weaker dollar implies elevated stock market performance (that is, the series are negatively correlated), but the strength of their correlation is only 28 percent.


Annual Change to Value of USD v. Stock Market Gain, 2007 to 2024

Perhaps a host of factors could converge to have the positives of a weaker dollar outweigh the negatives, but the odds of that are unlikely. It is much more likely that any gains for exporters fall well short of the losses suffered by hurting US consumers and financial markets. Nor should there be any trust that the administration can fine-tune weakening the dollar by a “perfect” amount to boost MNC exports but not damage the real wealth of US consumers.

The administration’s international trade policies already risk jeopardizing the economic health of US consumers. It should not compound that risk with policy errors related to international finance. Expecting or encouraging a weaker dollar is not the way to make US goods more attractive any more than a dose of caffeine and sugar is a sustainable way of fueling a workday. Yes, it could work in the short run, but the long-run effects not only undo but also outweigh any quick gains.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Fox News gets inside look at Gaza humanitarian situation as Israel weighs next steps
next post
Netherlands becomes first NATO ally to buy US weapons for Ukraine

You may also like

Georgia State Election Board: Lyft Shouldn’t Have Given...

August 12, 2025

Courts Decide Legal Questions About Foreign-Affairs Powers, Not...

February 6, 2024

What Are the Black Students Still Getting into...

September 26, 2024

Justice Thomas’s Individualist Concurrence

June 30, 2023

Backlash: Good Intentions Can Have Counter-Productive Consequences

August 31, 2023

Questioning the Housing Crisis: Crisis or Consumer Preference?

December 12, 2024

Sanders and Hawley Are Wrong on Rate Caps

February 18, 2025

Modi’s India Is Better in Economics than History

June 21, 2023

Law Firm Paul, Weiss Capitulates

March 22, 2025

Don’t Blame Ballot Harvesting Scandals On Drop Boxes

October 20, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Epstein estate hit with new House subpoena for ‘client list,’ call logs

      August 25, 2025
    • Trump’s Blast of Hot Air on Flag Burning

      August 25, 2025
    • The AI Action Plan: The Risks of Federal Ideological Bias Action

      August 25, 2025
    • Bolton unleashes on Trump Ukraine policy days after FBI raid

      August 25, 2025
    • Trump threatens lawsuit over century-old Senate tradition delaying his nominees

      August 25, 2025
    • Trump threatens lawsuit over ‘blue slips’ as top GOP senator bucks demand to bend Senate rules for nominees

      August 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,876)
    • Investing (2,239)
    • Politics (16,486)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved