Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions

by October 25, 2022
October 25, 2022
Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions

Harvard has spent over $27 million defending its race-based admission policy, according to an insurance filing.

The insurance filing became public after Harvard failed to file a timely formal claim with one of its insurance companies.

Now, the insurance company and Harvard are battling over $15 million of that cost.

New York Times reported:

As Harvard prepares to defend its race-conscious admissions program at the Supreme Court this month, a federal judge in Boston is considering a related dispute arising from a fumbled insurance filing, one that could cost the university $15 million.

Harvard failed to file a timely formal claim with one of its insurance companies for its expenses in defending the lawsuit challenging its admissions policies. That company, Zurich American Insurance, refused to pay, and Harvard sued. In the process, the university disclosed that its legal fees and expenses in the admissions lawsuit and a related Justice Department investigation had topped $27 million.

“One of the nation’s top universities is apparently not great about doing its homework,” said David Lat, a legal commentator.

Days after Students for Fair Admissions sued Harvard in 2014, arguing that its practice of taking account of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions was unlawful and harmed Asian American applicants, the university formally notified its primary insurance carrier to seek payment of its defense costs. That policy had a $25 million limit, after Harvard paid $2.5 million.

The Supreme Court is hearing Students for Fair Admissions Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, a race-based affirmative action case on October 31st.

Fox News reported:

The U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear one of two cases on Oct. 31 that could dismantle the 40-year precedent of race-based affirmative action in university admissions, with universities now urging the court to preserve the decision despite some expert opinion to the contrary.

Students for Fair Admissions Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College is one of two cases to come before the Supreme Court urging it to eliminate race as an admissions factor and, as a result, overturn the precedent case, Grutter v. Bollinger. The case also seeks to answer whether Harvard College violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act through its alleged discrimination against Asian American students, stemming from the initial lawsuit.

“It’s very clear to me that Harvard University was engaging in blatant discrimination. And what they were doing was they did not like the fact that Asian Americans — if they were simply admitted based on their credentials, qualifications — would have such a huge percentage of the student body,” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.

Why doesn’t Harvard lower the cost for students instead of spending millions defending this policy?

For the antidote to media bias, check out ProTrumpNews.com…

The post Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Richmond County Supreme Court Judge Ends New York City’s Vaccine Mandate for State Employees, City Appeals Using Tax-Payer Funds
next post
CLOWN SHOW: Biden Calls Kamala Harris “President” Again

You may also like

Biden admin to throw ‘morale booster’ party for...

January 5, 2024

Washington governor signs bill eliminating death penalty in...

April 22, 2023

Tim Scott is the leading Black Republican in...

September 5, 2023

Biden legacy includes relentless push for transgender agenda

December 8, 2024

DEVELOPING: Democrat-Led House Committee Now Has 6 Years...

November 30, 2022

Biden admin gives top energy post to climate...

January 13, 2023

6 times judges blocked Trump executive orders

February 12, 2025

RFK Jr. denies being antisemite, expresses regret over...

July 20, 2023

Federal court rules New Jersey can sue gun...

August 18, 2023

Is Biden upholding decency in the White House?...

July 9, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025
    • House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: ‘Iceberg is ahead’

      June 7, 2025
    • Call with China’s Xi, and Trump-Musk exchange fueled barbs during 20th week in office

      June 7, 2025
    • Trump’s conservative allies warn Congress faces critical ‘test’ with $9.4B spending cut proposal

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,568)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved