Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions

by October 25, 2022
October 25, 2022
Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions

Harvard has spent over $27 million defending its race-based admission policy, according to an insurance filing.

The insurance filing became public after Harvard failed to file a timely formal claim with one of its insurance companies.

Now, the insurance company and Harvard are battling over $15 million of that cost.

New York Times reported:

As Harvard prepares to defend its race-conscious admissions program at the Supreme Court this month, a federal judge in Boston is considering a related dispute arising from a fumbled insurance filing, one that could cost the university $15 million.

Harvard failed to file a timely formal claim with one of its insurance companies for its expenses in defending the lawsuit challenging its admissions policies. That company, Zurich American Insurance, refused to pay, and Harvard sued. In the process, the university disclosed that its legal fees and expenses in the admissions lawsuit and a related Justice Department investigation had topped $27 million.

“One of the nation’s top universities is apparently not great about doing its homework,” said David Lat, a legal commentator.

Days after Students for Fair Admissions sued Harvard in 2014, arguing that its practice of taking account of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions was unlawful and harmed Asian American applicants, the university formally notified its primary insurance carrier to seek payment of its defense costs. That policy had a $25 million limit, after Harvard paid $2.5 million.

The Supreme Court is hearing Students for Fair Admissions Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, a race-based affirmative action case on October 31st.

Fox News reported:

The U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear one of two cases on Oct. 31 that could dismantle the 40-year precedent of race-based affirmative action in university admissions, with universities now urging the court to preserve the decision despite some expert opinion to the contrary.

Students for Fair Admissions Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College is one of two cases to come before the Supreme Court urging it to eliminate race as an admissions factor and, as a result, overturn the precedent case, Grutter v. Bollinger. The case also seeks to answer whether Harvard College violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act through its alleged discrimination against Asian American students, stemming from the initial lawsuit.

“It’s very clear to me that Harvard University was engaging in blatant discrimination. And what they were doing was they did not like the fact that Asian Americans — if they were simply admitted based on their credentials, qualifications — would have such a huge percentage of the student body,” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.

Why doesn’t Harvard lower the cost for students instead of spending millions defending this policy?

For the antidote to media bias, check out ProTrumpNews.com…

The post Missed Insurance Filing Has Exposed How Much Harvard Is Paying To Defend Race-Based Admissions appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Richmond County Supreme Court Judge Ends New York City’s Vaccine Mandate for State Employees, City Appeals Using Tax-Payer Funds
next post
CLOWN SHOW: Biden Calls Kamala Harris “President” Again

You may also like

Shepard Smith’s CNBC Show Canceled

November 3, 2022

Trump signs rescissions package, closes out week with...

July 26, 2025

Cardi B suffers teleprompter glitch during Harris rally...

November 2, 2024

Iran foreign minister warns ‘preemptive action’ against Israel...

October 18, 2023

Dozens of female Trump staffers, surrogates blast Mark...

November 1, 2024

Five most significant allegations against the Bidens in...

July 22, 2023

Canada’s Trudeau announces resignation following party pressure amid...

January 6, 2025

NYC Mayor Adams calls out Biden, says migrant...

January 3, 2023

Biden greets Trump at White House with two-word...

January 20, 2025

Amal Clooney played key role in ICC arrest...

May 20, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 7, 2025
    • Biden camp skipped Super Bowl interview amid Robert Hur report concerns: Source

      August 7, 2025
    • Steve Bannon has two-word answer to dismiss 2028 presidential candidacy rumor

      August 7, 2025
    • $93 million in aid to fight malnutrition headed to 12 African countries, Haiti, State Dept says

      August 7, 2025
    • $93 million in aid to fight malnutrition headed to 12 African countries, Haiti, State Dept says

      August 7, 2025
    • America’s Not-So-Secret Secret Police

      August 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,704)
    • Investing (2,185)
    • Politics (16,337)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved