Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Women, Affirms Policy of Allowing Transgender Girls to Compete on Female Sports Teams in Connecticut Case

by December 17, 2022
December 17, 2022
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Women, Affirms Policy of Allowing Transgender Girls to Compete on Female Sports Teams in Connecticut Case

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)  filed a lawsuit to bar two transgender athletes — Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood — from competing in the 2020 spring outdoor track season on a girls team at a Connecticut school.

According to ADF:

Soule v. Connecticut Association of Schools, a lawsuit filed on behalf of four female athletes who were consistently deprived of honors and opportunities to compete at elite levels because the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference adopted a policy that allows males who identify as female to compete in girls’ athletic events.

Starting in 2017, two male athletes began competing in Connecticut girls’ high school track. In just three years, those two males broke 17 girls’ track meet records, deprived girls of more than 85 opportunities to advance to the next level of competition and took 15 women’s state track championship titles. Four of those championship titles were earned by ADF’s client, Chelsea Mitchell. Four times she was the fastest female in a women’s state championship race, and four times she watched that title, honor, and recognition go to a male athlete instead. Over the course of her high school career, Mitchell lost to these males more than 20 times.

The other female athletes represented in this case, Selina Soule, Alanna Smith, and Ashley Nicoletti, all likewise have been denied medals, placements, or advancement opportunities because of the male athletes competing on their team.

On Friday,  the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against women and affirmed a policy allowing  transgender students to compete on girls’ teams.

The Hill reports:

Transgender athletes in Connecticut and their advocates secured a victory on Friday when an appeals court ruled that the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) may move forward with a policy that allows transgender girls to compete on female sports teams.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that discrimination against transgender students violates Title IX, which prevents educational institutions that receive federal funding from discriminating based on sex.

“Today’s ruling is a critical victory for fairness, equality, and inclusion,” Joshua Block, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) who represented the CIAC, five Connecticut school boards and two former athletes in the case, said in a statement. “This critical victory strikes at the heart of political attacks against transgender youth while helping ensure every young person has the right to play.”

In a 2020 complaint, four cisgender high school athletes — Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, Alanna Smith and Ashley Nicoletti — alleged athletic opportunities had been taken away from them by transgender girls and argued that a 2013 CIAC policy permitting transgender athletes to compete on sports teams consistent with their gender identity was discriminatory because it had “regularly” resulted in the displacement of cisgender girls in competitive athletic events.

“In scholastic track competition in Connecticut, more boys than girls are experiencing victory,” the initial lawsuit stated, referring to the transgender female athletes.

Regarding the ruling, Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Christiana Kiefer shared, “The 2nd Circuit got it wrong, and we’re evaluating all legal options, including appeal. Our clients—like all female athletes—deserve access to fair competition. Thankfully, a growing number of states are stepping up to protect women’s athletics. Right now, 18 states have enacted laws that protect women and girls from having to compete against males, and polls show that a majority of Americans agree that the competition is no longer fair when males are permitted to compete in women’s sports. Every woman deserves the respect and dignity that comes with having an equal opportunity to excel and win in athletics, and ADF remains committed to protecting the future of women’s sports.”

The full ruling can be read here.

 

The post Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Women, Affirms Policy of Allowing Transgender Girls to Compete on Female Sports Teams in Connecticut Case appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
CNN Reaches New Levels of Hypocrisy, Needs Live Therapy Session After What Musk Did to Them
next post
Lib Presented with His Past Tweets After Threatening to Get Musk Hauled in Front of Congress: ‘Is This You?’

You may also like

RNC’s Ronna McDaniel declares ‘this is my last...

January 28, 2023

Here’s what happened during Trump’s 14th week in...

April 26, 2025

Biden Bungles Toast at State Dinner with French...

December 2, 2022

Lawless Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Sends...

October 11, 2022

‘Mass surveillance’: Conservatives sound alarm over Trump admin’s...

April 17, 2025

Al Gore explains global AI program that is...

January 19, 2023

Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court...

June 2, 2025

The People Rise Up: Iranian Revolutionaries Take up...

September 30, 2022

Rick Scott leads push to help parents keep...

May 25, 2023

Images released of Trump’s historic trip to NYC...

April 4, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • One in Five ICE Arrests Are Street Arrests of Latinos with No Criminal Past or Removal Orders

      August 5, 2025
    • Calls mount for Neil Woodford to be stripped of CBE as FCA hands down multi-million pound fine

      August 5, 2025
    • Why UK businesses are replacing VPNs with proxies amid rising regulatory scrutiny

      August 5, 2025
    • LIZ PEEK: Hillary is finally paying dearly for dirty tricks that hurt Trump and American voters

      August 5, 2025
    • Shein fined €1m in Italy for misleading environmental claims

      August 5, 2025
    • Rail services cut in southern England as dry weather disturbs track stability

      August 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,677)
    • Investing (2,172)
    • Politics (16,299)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved