Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

New York Times blasted as ‘racist’ for predicting affirmative action ruling will make colleges ‘whiter’

by June 30, 2023
June 30, 2023
New York Times blasted as ‘racist’ for predicting affirmative action ruling will make colleges ‘whiter’

The New York Times was widely criticized by conservatives on social media Thursday over a tweet that said the Supreme Court’s decision rejecting affirmative action would make colleges ‘whiter and more Asian.’

‘Breaking News: The Supreme Court rejected affirmative action at Harvard and UNC,’ the newspaper tweeted Thursday following the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision striking down affirmative action. 

‘The major ruling curtails race-conscious college admissions in the U.S., all but ensuring that elite institutions become whiter and more Asian and less Black and Latino.’

The tweet immediately drew criticism from conservatives, who called the tweet racist due to the implication that minority students won’t be able to compete with White students.

‘The New York Times appears to be inferring that black and brown people are too stupid to get into a colleges on their own merit,’ Timcast’s Josie Glabach tweeted.

‘Show us on the doll where equal protection under the law touched you, NYT,’ Federalist CEO Sean Davis tweeted.

The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

The nation’s highest court handed down the historic ruling on affirmative action Thursday and rejected the use of race as a factor in college admissions as a violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

Chief Justice John Roberts said for too long universities have ‘concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.’

Justice Clarence Thomas, the nation’s second Black justice, who had long called for an end to affirmative action, wrote separately that the decision ‘sees the universities’ admissions policies for what they are: rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes.’

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent that the decision ‘rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.’

In a separate dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the court’s first Black female justice, called the decision ‘truly a tragedy for us all.’

Associated Press contributed to this report

Andrew Mark Miller is a writer at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Fox News Poll: Ahead of 2024, voting retains title as top patriotic act
next post
DOD: Chinese spy balloon did not collect, transmit data as it transited US

You may also like

What’s next for Trump legally? Which case might...

May 31, 2024

Arrest of Chinese nationals in swing state, Israel’s...

June 21, 2025

Suburban School in Illinois Calls Police on Child...

December 9, 2022

USSS assistant director asked to retire over Butler...

September 10, 2024

Joe Biden Tells Reporters Americans “Want More” of...

November 5, 2022

Florida Coast Guard asks for help with migrant...

January 13, 2023

Hitchhiker’s guide to where we stand with the...

October 10, 2023

Who Wants to Tell Them?… New Yorkers Beg...

November 10, 2022

Trump softens Gaza stance, says Palestinians will not...

March 13, 2025

‘Great asset’: Radical Dems, socialists thrilled by Harris’...

August 9, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 10, 2025
    • DVLA to roll out digital driving licences by end of year in major services overhaul

      August 10, 2025
    • Self-employed Britons face fines of up to £900 under new HMRC quarterly tax rules

      August 10, 2025
    • Rachel Reeves tipped to target pensions, property and investments in bid to plug £50bn fiscal gap

      August 10, 2025
    • Ex-army pilot Peter Dilnot tops FTSE 100 ‘fat cat’ pay list with £45m package

      August 10, 2025
    • Rachel Reeves ‘underestimated’ parents’ prepayment push to avoid private school VAT

      August 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,735)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,349)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved