Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Senate Letter Expresses Doubts on US Security Guarantees to Saudi Arabia

by October 4, 2023
October 4, 2023
Senate Letter Expresses Doubts on US Security Guarantees to Saudi Arabia

Jon Hoffman

Twenty Democratic senators signed an open letter to President Biden today supporting the administration’s move to help broker normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel, but also signaling their concerns over providing Saudi Arabia with a formal security guarantee and help developing their civilian nuclear program.

The letter strongly suggests its authors worry that such a deal will not advance US interests and could result in heightened regional tensions or Washington’s further entanglement in the Middle East:

“We are concerned about reports that Saudi Arabia is requesting a security guarantee from the United States in exchange for normalization with Israel. Historically, security guarantees through defense treaties have only been provided to the closest of U.S. allies: democracies that share our interests and our values. Further, the U.S. has long refrained from committing our nation to treaty‐​backed security guarantees in the volatile Middle East, a region rife with conflict. A high degree of proof would be required to show that a binding defense treaty with Saudi Arabia – an authoritarian regime which regularly undermines U.S. interests in the region, has a deeply concerning human rights record, and has pursued an aggressive and reckless foreign policy agenda – aligns with U.S. interests, especially if such a commitment requires the U.S. to deploy substantial new permanent resources to the region.”

The letter echoes themes I detail at length in my recent policy analysis, Pariah or Partner? Reevaluating the U.S.-Saudi Relationship. Entering into a mutual security agreement with Saudi Arabia would represent a catastrophic miscalculation. A security guarantee for Saudi Arabia would entrap Washington as Riyadh’s protector despite a fundamental disconnect between the interests and values of the United States and the kingdom. Washington must not pay the costs of normalization while sacrificing its own interests in the process.

Washington’s ongoing support for actors like Saudi Arabia has resulted in a vicious cycle: by committing itself to propping up the underlying sources of regional instability, the United States repeatedly finds itself having to confront challenges that are largely the product of its own presence, policies, and partners in the Middle East.

The United States must decide whether it will continue underwriting actors such as Saudi Arabia and the artificial status quo in the Middle East, or whether it will recognize the failures of its own policies and limit its involvement to a level commensurate with US interests. The United States should approach Saudi Arabia as it would any other state that does not share our interests or our values: from arm’s length.

It is good to see so many senators asking tough questions about the administration’s thinking here. They should keep asking them. More of their colleagues ought to join them.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Sunak scraps A-levels and T-levels combining them into new baccalaureate-style ‘Advanced British Standard’ with pupils to study at five subjects including maths and English to 18
next post
Bond Yields Are Global. The Fed Can Undo an Inverted Yield Curve

You may also like

Money Is Not a Public Good

December 8, 2023

Preventing the Patchwork Promotes Innovation: Why a Moratorium...

June 12, 2025

House Republicans’ Reconciliation Bills Are Derelict on Health...

May 14, 2025

Trump’s Lawyers: FOIA Ignorance Edition

January 24, 2024

National Security Implications of Unsustainable Spending and Debt

July 27, 2023

Digital Currency or Digital Control Is Out Now!

June 18, 2024

Congress Must Heed Lessons of Previous Deficit Reductions

October 5, 2023

Financial Regulators’ Open-Source Crackdown Sets Bad Precedent for...

September 1, 2023

IVF Critics’ Claims Don’t Hold Up under Scrutiny

June 13, 2024

“Repeal the Tax Exclusion for Employer-Sponsored Insurance to...

January 24, 2025

Money Is Not a Public Good

December 8, 2023

Preventing the Patchwork Promotes Innovation: Why a Moratorium...

June 12, 2025

House Republicans’ Reconciliation Bills Are Derelict on Health...

May 14, 2025

Trump’s Lawyers: FOIA Ignorance Edition

January 24, 2024

National Security Implications of Unsustainable Spending and Debt

July 27, 2023

Digital Currency or Digital Control Is Out Now!

June 18, 2024

Congress Must Heed Lessons of Previous Deficit Reductions

October 5, 2023

Financial Regulators’ Open-Source Crackdown Sets Bad Precedent for...

September 1, 2023

IVF Critics’ Claims Don’t Hold Up under Scrutiny

June 13, 2024

“Repeal the Tax Exclusion for Employer-Sponsored Insurance to...

January 24, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Digital divide widens as 74% of regional SMEs miss out on vital support

      July 8, 2025
    • Apple appeals €500m EU fine over App Store restrictions, accusing Commission of overreach

      July 8, 2025
    • UK steel firms on edge as US tariff deadline looms amid incomplete deal

      July 8, 2025
    • ThinCats hits record lending levels with £381m despite challenging UK business climate

      July 8, 2025
    • Flight of the non-doms: how worried should Labour be about the super‑rich leaving the UK?

      July 8, 2025
    • UK house prices stall in June as stamp duty change and weak economy hit confidence

      July 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,416)
    • Investing (2,105)
    • Politics (15,958)
    • Stocks (3,192)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved