Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

by March 15, 2024
March 15, 2024
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

In a landmark ruling, the judge presiding over the legal dispute regarding the inventorship of Bitcoin has declared that Australian computer scientist Craig Wright is not the creator of the cryptocurrency.

The verdict, delivered by Mr Justice Mellor after a five-week trial at the High Court, came promptly following the conclusion of proceedings. Despite expectations of deliberation, the judge cited overwhelming evidence leading to a swift decision.

Bitcoin, the world’s most renowned cryptocurrency, has been thrust into the limelight recently with its unprecedented surge to a new record valuation. Yet, the identity of its creator, known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, has remained a mystery. Since 2016, Dr. Wright has asserted himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, but his claims have faced scrutiny from cryptocurrency experts, and his supporting evidence has been subject to skepticism.

Dr. Wright has been embroiled in legal battles for years, defending his narrative against individuals who contested his assertions. This particular case, heard at the Intellectual Property Court of London’s High Court, was initiated by a consortium of Bitcoin companies, including members of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), which includes Jack Dorsey’s payments firm, Block. COPA accused Dr. Wright of hindering cryptocurrency development through aggressive litigation tactics.

During the trial, COPA’s legal team accused Dr. Wright of engaging in a “massive campaign of dishonesty and forgery,” alleging that he had even forged documents while the proceedings were ongoing. Jonathan Hough, COPA’s lawyer, emphasized the seriousness of Dr. Wright’s actions, characterizing some aspects as farcical yet stressing their significant ramifications.

Dr. Wright’s defense contended that if he were not the true inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto would have surfaced to refute his claims. However, Mr. Justice Mellor concurred with the plaintiffs, affirming that Dr. Wright was not the individual behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto and did not create the Bitcoin system. A comprehensive written judgement is expected to follow the judge’s ruling.

The outcome of this trial marks a significant milestone in the ongoing quest to unravel the mysteries surrounding Bitcoin’s origins and reinforces the enduring enigma surrounding its creator.

Read more:
Judge Dismisses Claim of Australian Computer Scientist as Bitcoin Inventor

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Centrist group No Labels sets up panel to select third-party presidential ticket
next post
Missed Out on Micron’s 112% Surge? Here’s Your Second Chance!

You may also like

SME XPO Reveals further details on this years...

April 18, 2023

UK inflation dips below Bank of England target...

October 16, 2024

Staff allowed to choose working hours in new...

July 11, 2024

UK government sees surprise budget surplus in January

February 21, 2023

London has most pub closures in first six...

October 9, 2023

7 Secrets to mindful living for students

February 9, 2023

Manufacturing output weakest in eight months as interest...

August 18, 2023

IoD calls for more ambitious exports target

September 26, 2023

Why Solomon Island Citizenship Is Gaining Attention Among...

October 9, 2024

RMT votes overwhelmingly for further train strikes

May 5, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Snub of Musk’s NASA nominee ally preceded sudden ‘big, beautiful bill’ criticism, Trump feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Supreme Court rules DOGE can access Social Security information

      June 6, 2025
    • US sanctions money laundering network aiding Iran as regime faces nuclear reprimand at IAEA

      June 6, 2025
    • From Tariffs to Tech: Where Smart Money’s Moving Right Now

      June 6, 2025
    • Your Weekly Stock Market Snapshot: What It Means for Your Investments

      June 6, 2025
    • Getting It Half-Baked: The Real Cause of Cannabis Market Failures

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,555)
    • Stocks (3,134)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved