Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Who Will Report on Tariffs’ Unseen Costs?

by May 31, 2024
May 31, 2024
Who Will Report on Tariffs’ Unseen Costs?

Scott Lincicome

The recent Wall Street Journal article, “Meet the Shirt Maker Who Loves U.S. Tariffs,” is a modern (and frustrating) version of French economist Frédéric Bastiat’s classic parable of the broken window. It praises the “seen” benefits of US apparel tariffs—the handful of American manufacturers whose products have “again become competitive in the global marketplace”—while totally ignoring their many “unseen” costs.

Most obviously, the article refers to the higher prices that American consumers will now pay for clothing as merely something US importers “say” might happen, when in fact we know from recent experience that these costs are real and significant.

According to the US International Trade Commission, for example, the “Section 301” tariffs on Chinese apparel imports—the very tariffs at issue here—increased the price of Chinese apparel by 14.5 percent, the price of US apparel by 3.1 percent, and average US apparel prices overall by 4.3 percent. That’s an invisible tax of more than $3.5 billion in 2021 alone—one that was disproportionately paid by lower‐​income American consumers and that constituted money that couldn’t be spent on other, more productive US enterprises.

Also unseen is the fact that, again per the ITC, the China tariffs resulted in only a modest (6.3 percent, or about $770 million) increase in American apparel production that same year, because US consumption shifted not to American‐​made clothing but other import sources (a 25.2 percent increase in 2021). Overall, therefore, the US economy has suffered yearly tariff‐​related losses more than four times as large as the gains the article cheers—a miserable result that’s anything but surprising given that the same commission in 2017 found that the removal of earlier US apparel tariffs would increase net US welfare by $2.4 billion.

And for what? Suits, t‑shirts, and jeans have no national security implications, so economic losses from forcing their production onshore are not “strategically” justifiable (non‐​China imports notwithstanding). Production jobs in the domestic industry pay as little as $11/​hour and only a few dollars more in New York City, where the Journal article’s chief protagonist is located (and where fast food workers make almost as much). The manpower and other finite resources directed to tariff‐​protected industries also now can’t be used for other, more productive business operations in the region—another unseen cost of protectionism.

Call me a heartless globalist if you must, but the US government shouldn’t be in the business of regressively taxing the clothing purchases of Americans still reeling from inflation, all to support—at a substantial net loss—relatively low‐​paying apparel jobs in the Big Apple. It’s a bad policy, and certainly nothing for a newspaper to cheer about.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Biden mocked for ‘disturbing’ smile after ignoring question about Trump being ‘political prisoner’
next post
New Medicaid Regulations Unlikely to Improve Accessibility and Transparency

You may also like

Senate Report Highlighting Bias in Online Services Shows...

May 1, 2024

Kamala Harris’s Misguided Family Policy

August 28, 2024

Does Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment Disqualify...

August 25, 2023

Milton Friedman: ‘Crack Would Never Have Existed If...

July 31, 2024

Trump Administration Shouldn’t Designate Drug Cartels as Foreign...

February 5, 2025

California Forever Project Must Overcome Land-Use Restrictions

September 7, 2023

In Defense of Elbridge Colby

July 9, 2025

Some Welcome Trade Facts from White House Economists

March 22, 2024

The Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017

August 29, 2024

Border Patrol: 70 Percent Drop in Successful Evasions...

March 4, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 11, 2025
    • Zelenskyy thanks NATO, European leaders for backing his push to join Trump‑Putin summit

      August 10, 2025
    • NATO chief says upcoming Trump-Putin meeting will be about ‘testing’ Russian leader

      August 10, 2025
    • Summertime and the living is uneasy on Capitol Hill

      August 10, 2025
    • Putin ally warns ‘titanic efforts’ are underway to sink Trump summit over Ukraine war

      August 10, 2025
    • Farage faces rising tension with younger Reform voters over net zero stance

      August 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,742)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,356)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved