Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Disney claims widower cannot sue over wife’s death at theme park restaurant due to Disney+ subscription agreement

by August 15, 2024
August 15, 2024
Disney claims widower cannot sue over wife’s death at theme park restaurant due to Disney+ subscription agreement

Disney has come under fire for arguing that a widower whose wife tragically died after suffering a severe allergic reaction at a Walt Disney World restaurant cannot pursue legal action against the company because he had previously signed up for a free trial of Disney’s streaming service, Disney+.

Kanokporn Tangsuan, a 42-year-old medical doctor, died after consuming food at Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant in Disney Springs, Florida, despite her family’s repeated assurances from their server that the meal would be allergen-free. Following her death in October last year, her husband, Jeffrey Piccolo, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, accusing the company of negligence in failing to properly train staff on handling food allergies.

However, Disney has sought to dismiss the case, citing the arbitration clause within the Disney+ Subscriber Agreement, which Piccolo agreed to when he signed up for the service in November 2019. The company claims that this clause applies to “all disputes,” including those involving its affiliates, which include Walt Disney Parks and Resorts.

Piccolo’s legal team has slammed Disney’s defence as “preposterous” and “surreal,” arguing that agreeing to a streaming service’s terms should not waive his right to a jury trial in a wrongful death case. The case has sparked a debate over the enforceability of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, especially when applied to unrelated matters such as personal injury or wrongful death.

While Disney maintains that it is simply defending itself against an attempt to involve the company in a lawsuit related to a restaurant it does not directly own, the case raises broader questions about the reach of arbitration agreements and the rights of consumers. Legal experts have suggested that a judge may find it unreasonable to extend the arbitration clause from a streaming service contract to a wrongful death claim, particularly in a case involving such serious allegations.

The case continues to unfold as Piccolo seeks over $50,000 in damages for mental pain and suffering, funeral and medical expenses, and loss of income. Disney’s position has sparked widespread criticism and raised concerns about the ethical implications of using such contractual clauses to shield against legal liability in severe cases.

Read more:
Disney claims widower cannot sue over wife’s death at theme park restaurant due to Disney+ subscription agreement

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Celebrities have ‘incredibly powerful’ ability to influence election: Harvard study
next post
Pret A Manger leads high street coffee price hikes with 57% increase over five years, Greggs remains most affordable

You may also like

‘EV Health Checker’ creator ClearWatt reaches £200,000 fundraising...

May 22, 2024

BT backs Altitude Angel to be UK’s global...

January 5, 2023

Why Some Businesses Scale Effortlessly (And What You...

March 13, 2025

How to Navigate the Challenges of Career Reinvention

July 18, 2024

Workers warned over out of office email sins...

July 7, 2023

Saudis buy 49% stake in Forte Hotels group

December 5, 2023

Prime Minister’s ‘Maths to 18’ plan comes with...

July 26, 2023

Banks prepare to tighten supply of new mortgages

April 14, 2023

Are financial advisers in demand?

August 28, 2024

DukeMarkets: Online Trading Broker Review (Updated 2023)

February 28, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025
    • House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: ‘Iceberg is ahead’

      June 7, 2025
    • Call with China’s Xi, and Trump-Musk exchange fueled barbs during 20th week in office

      June 7, 2025
    • Trump’s conservative allies warn Congress faces critical ‘test’ with $9.4B spending cut proposal

      June 7, 2025
    • Tech ETFs are Leading Since April, but Another Group is Leading YTD

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,567)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved