Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Grocery Price Gouging?

by August 19, 2024
August 19, 2024
Grocery Price Gouging?

Peter Van Doren

Soon-to-be Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris announced a proposal to empower the federal government to ban corporate price gouging in grocery prices. Historically, politicians often float price control proposals when prices of energy or housing increase. Groceries are a new addition to the list.

Earlier this year Cato published a book about price controls edited by my colleague Ryan Bourne. While it does not include a chapter on grocery price controls because of the lack of historical precedent, it does contain a chapter entitled “Greed and Corporate Concentration Have Not Caused Inflation.”

The good news, in this case, is that reaction to the grocery price control proposal in both the New York Times and the Washington Post included criticism of the proposal before anyone at Cato had blogged about it.

An economist quoted in the Times article said, “If prices are rising on average over time and profit margins expand, that might look like price gouging, but it’s actually indicative of a broad increase in demand. Such broad increases tend to be the result of expansionary monetary or fiscal policy—or both.”

The title of Catherine Rampell’s column in the Post is quite blunt: “When your opponent calls you ‘communist,’ maybe don’t propose price controls?” In the column she says, “It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is.”

In my chapter in Ryan’s book, I concluded that the 1970s experience with energy price controls was so negative that congressional responses to constituent anger about energy prices in the last twenty years have consisted of calls for the FTC to investigate the usual suspects rather than actual price controls. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s current Senate proposal goes further. It would empower the FTC to investigate not just the usual suspects but ban any “grossly excessive price.”

The bad news is that Harris’s proposal suggests memories of the chaos created by 1970s oil and gas price controls may be fading. The good news is that the media have not forgotten.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Brazilian Judiciary’s Continued Censorship and the Brussels-Brasilia Effect
next post
Americans Paid for the Trump Tariffs—and Would Do So Again

You may also like

Locating Islam in the “New” Middle East

February 11, 2025

Grow the Economic Pie, Don’t Reallocate It

October 28, 2024

United States v. Moore Brief: Universal Disarmament of...

September 24, 2024

A Record Quarter of a Million International Students...

March 19, 2024

Taiwan Arms Backlog, July 2024 Update

August 5, 2024

Owners Have the Right to Choose Who Lives...

June 6, 2024

Try Cato’s New Immigration Game: Find Your Path...

August 8, 2023

New Data: Criminal Crossings Reached Record Highs in...

August 22, 2023

Johan Norberg: Bernie Sanders’ Vision of Sweden is...

October 31, 2023

Biden Didn’t Cause the Border Crisis, Part 1:...

January 16, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump ally stands firm against ‘big, beautiful bill’ despite pressure: ‘It’ll completely backfire’

      June 8, 2025
    • Rubio condemns assassination attempt on Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe

      June 8, 2025
    • Obama WH physician says Biden doc should have performed cognitive test

      June 8, 2025
    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved