Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

USTR Acknowledges China Tariffs Failed, Will Continue Anyway

by October 18, 2024
October 18, 2024
USTR Acknowledges China Tariffs Failed, Will Continue Anyway

Clark Packard

During a recent stop in Pennsylvania, US Trade Representative Katherine Tai was asked by Eric Martin of Bloomberg about the Biden administration’s decision to continue and expand tariffs on Chinese goods imposed under President Trump. She replied that the tariffs remain in place because “… we really haven’t seen the PRC (People’s Republic of China) make any changes to fundamental systemic structural policies that would make sense for us to provide any relaxation” and that the tariffs could provide leverage in some future, unspecified negotiation with the Chinese.

In 2018, the Trump administration issued its Section 301 report on Chinese trade and investment practices. Though flawed in certain respects, the lengthy report documented a litany of legitimately concerning policies employed by the Chinese government in pursuit of its 21st-century high-tech mercantilist agenda, which burden American commerce and hurt American workers. Based on the report’s findings, the Trump administration imposed a series of heavy tariffs that they claimed would force Beijing to make structural changes to its international trade and investment practices.

Over the last six-plus years, those tariffs have imposed significant costs on Americans as Cato scholars have repeatedly highlighted. Perhaps those costs could be justified if the tariffs had forced a wholesale reorientation of Chinese economic policies.

Instead, Americans have the worst of both worlds: tariffs continue to harm American firms and families while Beijing’s abusive practices continue largely unabated as Ambassador Tai and others—like the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission—acknowledge.

After more than six years of costly failure, the United States needs a different approach. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) dispute settlement system needs to be reinvigorated, but when operational offers a forum to hold Beijing accountable for violating its WTO commitments as Cato analysis has shown. Likewise, rejoining the Trans-Pacific Partnership can raise commercial standards—and help offset China’s gravitational pull in the Pacific region—by establishing a large trading bloc of countries committed to high-quality, rules-based trade and investment practices.

Ultimately, Washington’s ability to force wholesale changes onto the Chinese economy is limited. Instead, growth should be the north star of US economic policy vis-à-vis China and policymakers should trust the United States’ traditional strengths: a commitment to the rule of law, openness to international trade and immigration, and dedication to dynamic, market-based innovation. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
‘Kamala Era’: DNC launches Taylor Swift-themed campaign in pitch to young voters
next post
A Strong Week: Stocks, Gold, and Crypto’s Robust Performance

You may also like

My Year’s Worth of Election Law Writing

January 3, 2025

Cato Tax Bootcamp: An International Tax Primer

February 4, 2025

Ballot Measures: A Preview

October 13, 2023

House Judiciary Committee Report Documents More Evidence of...

May 13, 2024

Immigration Benefits the Destination Country

March 29, 2025

If the Office of Civil Rights Is Removed...

April 4, 2025

Arrest of Telegram CEO Yet Another Threat to...

August 27, 2024

The Supreme Court Strikes Down Biden’s Loan‐​Forgiveness Program

June 30, 2023

Biden Administration Doubles Down on Costly “Buying American”...

June 6, 2023

The Long-Term Reputational Costs of Trumpian Protectionism

March 22, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • SME lending delays slashed by 80% thanks to fintech-driven back-office reform

      June 10, 2025
    • UK defence innovation strategy opens new doors for SMEs in AI and autonomous tech

      June 10, 2025
    • Shark Tank study shows charming narcissists get funding

      June 10, 2025
    • Social media creators to eclipse traditional media in global ad revenue for first time

      June 10, 2025
    • London AI firm claims Getty copyright lawsuit is an ‘existential threat’ to generative tech industry

      June 10, 2025
    • UK wage growth slows and unemployment rises to four-year high

      June 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,170)
    • Investing (2,021)
    • Politics (15,579)
    • Stocks (3,138)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved