Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Reminder to Republicans: Lots of Low-Hanging Tax Code Spending to Cut

by February 10, 2025
February 10, 2025
Reminder to Republicans: Lots of Low-Hanging Tax Code Spending to Cut

Adam N. Michel

Some Republican members of Congress believe that extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts with anything less than $4.7 trillion in revenue reductions is impossible. This belief is misguided. Such a large tax cut—without equally large spending cuts—suggests Republicans may have given up on cutting spending and other subsidies in the tax code. The tax code still has trillions of dollars in loopholes and spending that should be easy to cut in reconciliation.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s (TCJA) net tax cut of $5.5 trillion was more than 70 percent paid for with other tax changes that increased revenue. This model of pairing base broadeners with tax cuts should be a road map for 2025. 

There is plenty of spending to cut outside the tax code, but those cuts should not preclude members from also cutting spending and loopholes in the tax code. House Republicans should push the Ways and Means Committee to look harder in their own backyard. There are trillions of dollars of spending in the tax code that should be repealed or reformed.

The House Budget Committee recently detailed 30 options to raise revenue and reform the tax base. In a recent Tax Foundation blog, William McBride explains how “curtailing tax expenditures could offset several trillion dollars of tax cuts.” I’ve detailed a list of twelve revenue-raising improvements to the tax code, and the Cato Tax Plan includes over $14 trillion to cut in distortion tax credits, deductions, and loopholes. There is no shortage of lists that detail ways to offset tax cuts with other changes to the tax code.

The political response is often that many of these reforms are not politically viable, which may be true of some. However, even the messy political process leaves many tax expenditures ripe for elimination or reform. For example: 

Green energy subsidies. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 dramatically expanded tax subsidies for the environmental left’s favorite energy sources. Reforming a fraction of the tax code’s $1.2 trillion in ten-year energy subsidies could lead to substantial savings. Repealing all IRA and pre-IRA energy tax programs would offset more than 20 percent of the tax package. Just repealing the electric vehicle credits could raise as much as $224 billion over ten years.

Tax breaks for stadiums. President Trump recently asked Congress to eliminate “special tax breaks for billionaire sports team owners.” One subsidy many sports teams benefit from is tax-exempt bonds financed by state and local governments. According to one estimate, 57 stadiums benefit from a subsidy that resulted in a $4.3 billion loss in federal revenue. Repealing the broader category of tax-exempt muni bonds could raise as much as $400 billion over ten years.

Corporate SALT reform. In 2017, Congress put a $10,000 cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction for individual and pass-through businesses. As bad as it would be for sound policymaking, politics may require raising the cap for individuals. Whatever the level, the individual SALT cap should be paired with a similar limit on the deduction for large corporations and a rule against state workarounds to level the playing field between big and small businesses. Whatever size Congress decides the deduction should be, the cap should be evenly applied to all business types and sizes. Depending on design, business SALT reform could raise between $400 billion and $800 billion over ten years.

Other examples of tax offsets that should be easy to include:

Repeal the pandemic-era Employee Retention Tax Credit. Savings: $77 billion.
Limit noncitizen access to refundable tax credits. Savings: $28 billion to $230 billion over ten years.
Repeal limitation on the recapture of Obamacare exchange subsidy overpayments. Savings: $96 billion over ten years.
Limit deductibility of fringe benefits, such as commuting expenses, gyms, and meals. Savings: $157 billion to $300 billion over ten years.
Reform treatment of the tax-exempt economy. Savings: $400 billion over ten years.

This list is just a fraction of the roughly $14 trillion in distortionary loopholes, credits, deductions, and other spending in the tax code. Republicans should not give up on cutting spending across the entire federal budget, including in the tax code. More aggressive cuts will allow Congress room to design a permanent, pro-growth tax reform that allows Americans to keep more of their hard-earned money.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump Orders Review of Federal Second Amendment Policies
next post
Iran’s campaign trail threats against Trump more serious than publicly reported, book claims

You may also like

New Defending Globalization Content: The Conservative and Progressive...

May 30, 2024

The State of Student Loan Forgiveness: April 2024

April 1, 2024

President Biden’s Proposed Budget

March 11, 2024

Taiwan’s Officials Should Not be Complacent on Arms...

November 22, 2023

The Prospects for Mar-a-Gaza

February 5, 2025

TikTok Panic Threatens Speech

April 21, 2023

As GLP-1 Drug Shortage Ends, Why Will Patients...

October 11, 2024

World Press Freedom Day: The Global Free Speech...

May 3, 2023

Trump’s Detention Surge Failed to Significantly Increase Removals

January 10, 2024

What’s Driving the Drop in Overdose Deaths?

May 15, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • US and China hold London talks to ease trade war tensions

      June 9, 2025
    • British fathers urged to join landmark ‘dad strike’ over poor paternity leave

      June 9, 2025
    • IVF parents should have right to paid fertility leave, says GMB union

      June 9, 2025
    • Reform UK clashes with Bank of England over interest payments to lenders

      June 9, 2025
    • Trump ally stands firm against ‘big, beautiful bill’ despite pressure: ‘It’ll completely backfire’

      June 8, 2025
    • Rubio condemns assassination attempt on Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe

      June 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,156)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved