Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

If Student Loans Are Removed From the Department of Education, Where Should They Go?

by April 1, 2025
April 1, 2025
If Student Loans Are Removed From the Department of Education, Where Should They Go?

Andrew Gillen

As momentum for closing the US Department of Education gains steam, questions about the transition are starting to surface, with the biggest ones concerning student loans. While we have argued for the privatization of student loans (full report or blog summary), which would eliminate the need for a new home for student loans, most of the current discussion revolves around keeping the existing loan programs but moving them to another department or agency, with the Department of the Treasury and the Small Business Administration (SBA) being the most discussed new homes. Treasury is the better choice for three reasons.

First, just under 40 percent of students are repaying through an income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, which requires information on income, information that the Treasury already has but SBA does not. Under IDR plans, payments are a set percentage of income (typically 10 percent) each month. With monthly payments varying, the length of the loan varies too, with high earners repaying their loans more quickly. Since the Treasury already collects income information (through the Internal Revenue Service) needed for IDR, it is better positioned to manage IDR plans than the SBA.

Second, the Treasury already has systems set up and running to deal with troublesome loans. For example, the Treasury Offset Program is used to collect unpaid taxes and student loans from borrowers who default by garnishing their tax refunds and other government payments. The SBA would have to set up its own system or outsource the task to Treasury.

Third, SBA’s experience facilitating loans is irrelevant for student loans. One of the main things the SBA does is provide loan guarantees to private lenders, which means it has considerable experience evaluating the quality of loans (often called underwriting). But student loans do not go through underwriting as eligibility and loan terms are all set by Congress, which renders SBA’s greater experience in underwriting irrelevant. Relatedly, SBA’s experience with loan guarantees is likewise irrelevant, because student loans should not have loan guarantees.

Overall, if student loans are moved, the Department of the Treasury would be a better choice than the Small Business Administration. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump pick for Joint Chiefs chair tells Senate element of surprise ‘likely lost’ amid Signal chat leak
next post
AU Surges Above Resistance: Here’s How to Take Action

You may also like

Does Capturing Drug Kingpins Reduce Violence?

August 8, 2024

Friday Feature: City of Fountains

January 3, 2025

Recapping the Cato Tax Boot Camp

February 7, 2025

Defund the (Diversity) Police

December 7, 2023

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

Biden Hikes Corporate Tax Expenditures 92%

April 1, 2024

Friday Feature: Oklahoma Parental Choice Tax Credit Program

June 9, 2023

Biden’s Newest Folly on Student Loan Forgiveness

April 24, 2024

A Return to US Casualty Aversion: The 9/11...

April 22, 2024

CBO Projects Challenging Fiscal Future in Long‐​Term Budget...

June 29, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Virgin orders 12 new Alstom trains in bid to challenge Eurostar from 2030

      August 14, 2025
    • Housing market slows as buyers await autumn budget tax decisions

      August 14, 2025
    • 2,000 jobs at risk as Claire’s UK enters administration after US parent’s bankruptcy

      August 14, 2025
    • MPs call for free bus travel for under-22s in England to boost access to jobs and training

      August 14, 2025
    • Balfour Beatty chief urges Reeves to rethink non-dom tax changes to boost UK investment

      August 14, 2025
    • Dragons’ Den star Sara Davies increases stake in Crafter’s Companion as Maven takes majority

      August 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,776)
    • Investing (2,205)
    • Politics (16,385)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved