Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Trump-backed bill to rein in federal judges gets House-wide vote

by April 8, 2025
April 8, 2025

The House of Representatives is expected to vote Tuesday on a bill to limit federal district court judges’ ability to block President Donald Trump’s agenda on a national scale.

The No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA) was introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., earlier this year and quickly became a priority for House GOP leaders after Trump made clear he supported the bill.

House Republicans see it as a way to fight back against ‘rogue’ judges blocking Trump’s agenda. 

The Trump administration has faced more than 15 nationwide injunctions since the Republican commander in chief took office, targeting a wide range of Trump policies from birthright citizenship reform to anti-diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

Issa’s bill would limit district judges – of which there are more than 670 – from issuing rulings with nationwide effect. Instead, they would be forced to tailor those rulings to the specific parties named in the lawsuit.

It has broad support from House Republicans and the backing of GOP leadership.

However, Issa told Fox News Digital that he was skeptical it would get any Democratic support.

‘Sadly, I’m not sure that it will. It obviously should,’ Issa said last week. ‘The administration can win 15 times, and they lose once—they get an injunction. That’s not the way it’s supposed to be.’

Issa pointed out that district judges overstepping was not just a Republican complaint.

‘I mean, we could have called [President Joe Biden’s] former solicitor general and ask, have you changed your opinion in less than a year? Of course, the answer would be no,’ he said.

Former Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued in a December filing to the Supreme Court, regarding a district judge barring the Biden administration from enforcing a financial crimes law, ‘Universal injunctions exert substantial pressure on this court’s emergency docket, and they visit substantial disruption on the execution of the laws.’

The legislation advanced through the House Rules Committee on Monday night with no Democratic support.

It was expected to get a vote last week, but an unrelated fight about remote voting for new parents derailed House proceedings and sent lawmakers home less than 24 hours after they had returned to Washington for the week. That matter has since been resolved.

A procedural vote is expected on Tuesday at about 1:30 p.m. ET. If it passes, as expected, lawmakers will debate and vote on the final bill later in the day.

It must pass the Senate – where it would need at least some Democratic support to reach its 60-vote threshold – before heading to Trump’s desk for a signature.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Benjamin Anderson (1949): The Crowning Financial Folly of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff
next post
Gabbard establishes new intelligence community task force to restore transparency

You may also like

Jeff Bezos’ fiancée Lauren Sanchez sparks backlash at...

January 20, 2025

Mike Johnson reveals where House stands as GOP...

November 6, 2024

Democrat Sen. Fetterman’s office releases update after he...

February 28, 2023

Where is the AI boom? Experts caution new...

January 18, 2024

First lady Melania Trump’s new official portrait revealed

January 27, 2025

Aftermath of Category 4 Storm “Hurricane Ian” Shows...

September 30, 2022

‘Funding terrorism’: GOP lawmakers demand Blinken’s plan for...

June 18, 2024

Pentagon fires Greenland US base commander who ‘undermined’...

April 11, 2025

Shadow campaigns: 7 Democrat candidates who could step...

July 3, 2024

EXCLUSIVE – ANDREW WEISSMANN PART VIII: Weissmann and...

October 17, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Starmer accused of betraying farmers as British food pledge stalls

      August 22, 2025
    • Fed rate cut looms after Powell’s Jackson Hole speech

      August 22, 2025
    • Tariff “Inclusion” Process Comes with High Costs, Absurd Outcomes, and Extra Cronyism

      August 22, 2025
    • Trump DOJ releases ‘thousands’ of Epstein files to House Oversight Committee

      August 22, 2025
    • Jackson scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues after high-profile ruling

      August 22, 2025
    • ‘Leftist’ taxpayer-funded academy sparks backlash after moving against Trump’s rollback of key regulation

      August 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,857)
    • Investing (2,235)
    • Politics (16,464)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved