Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Federal Versus State Policies

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025
Federal Versus State Policies

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
WeightWatchers pivots from diets to drugs in UK partnership with anti-obesity treatment provider CheqUp
next post
New book exposes how top Biden comms staffer was ‘tip of the spear’ covering up Biden’s cognitive decline

You may also like

The Historical Ratio Between Dropout and High School...

May 29, 2025

Judge Blocks Jawboning?

July 5, 2023

The First Amendment Protects Against Bad‐​Faith Prosecutions

June 8, 2023

Should Election Authorities Publish the Records of Individual...

November 29, 2023

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

The Senate Plan Is a Trap—House Lawmakers Shouldn’t...

April 8, 2025

DC Purple Line Cost Overruns and Delays Continue

March 11, 2024

End All Taxpayer Funding of CPB, NPR, PBS

April 11, 2025

New Defending Globalization Essays: China Then; China Now;...

October 10, 2023

A Fiscal Hawk’s Defense of the GOP’s Deficit-Busting...

July 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • DAVID MARCUS: Zany Zohran endorsement is existential choice for Hakeem Jeffries

      July 26, 2025
    • FTC firings take spotlight in Trump’s fight to erase independence of agencies

      July 26, 2025
    • DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified Trump-Russia docs: Here’s what they say

      July 26, 2025
    • Trump signs rescissions package, closes out week with trip to Scotland

      July 26, 2025
    • CHARLIE KIRK: Republicans must seize Gen Z moment or risk losing an entire generation

      July 26, 2025
    • Technology in Hospitality: Innovations Shaping Guest Experiences

      July 26, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,580)
    • Investing (2,151)
    • Politics (16,208)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved