Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Taxpayer Funding for Religious Schools?

by June 13, 2023
June 13, 2023

Jeffrey Miron

This article appeared on Substack on June 13, 2023

The state of Oklahoma has recently approved a charter for the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, whose curriculum will include religious teaching. Taxpayers will fund the school, so a battle will ensue over whether such funding is desirable or constitutional.

Economic reasoning suggests three possible justifications for government support of education.

First, one person’s education might benefit society more broadly. Economic productivity might be higher, for example, if everyone has mastered “the three Rs.” Some individuals, however, might ignore this “spillover” and therefore choose too little education relative to the social optimum.

Second, people for whom education would be productive (by raising their future income) might underinvest due to myopia, suggesting that even without spillovers, the laissez‐​faire level of education might be too low. Some parents, in particular, might choose too little education for their children unless policy makes education cheaper.

Third, people for whom education would be beneficial, with or without externalities, and even without myopia, might have insufficient income to pay for private education and face difficulty in borrowing to finance such an investment (credit constraints).

Reasonable people can debate whether these arguments are convincing. Each has some plausibility, yet each is easily overstated.

In Libertarian Land, governments play no role in education, whether via mandatory schooling, public schools, funding for vouchers or charters, state colleges and universities, or subsidized student loans.

The reason is that, while government support might have the benefits described, this support requires government to define what constitutes education, as the Oklahoma controversy illustrates. Government definition of education limits variety and innovation, and in the extreme facilitates thought control. It is no accident that totalitarian regimes exercise extreme control over their educational systems.

If one nevertheless takes as given that, for the foreseeable future, government will fund education, and have the power to determine what kinds of education receive this support, should taxpayer funding be available for religious schools?

Assuming such education meets the curricular standards that government imposes on all schools, public and private, the answer is yes.

Why? Because religious schools can generate the three benefits that potentially justify government support of education. This is the standard reasoning for allowing private religious schools (or home schooling) to satisfy mandatory schooling laws.

Stated differently, allowing taxpayer funding to religious schools that meet the criteria for funding under the state’s general rules (e.g., teaching the three Rs) is the neutral position for government with respect to religion. This neutrality is the natural interpretation of the Constitution’s establishment clause, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

Thus libertarians would prefer little or no government involvement in education. If government does fund education, however, it should not exclude religious schools a priori but instead determine funding based on the criteria that might justify such intervention in the first place.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
5 Reasons why you need a requirements gathering software
next post
Why Legal Immigration Is Impossible for Nearly Everyone

You may also like

The Charges Against Donald Trump

June 14, 2023

The OECD’s Pillar One Global Tax Cannot Be...

March 14, 2024

My Washington Post Letter to the Editor about...

July 12, 2023

More on Free Trade’s “Pro-Poor Bias”

March 29, 2024

Populism and the Future of the Fed: A...

July 29, 2022

New Defending Globalization Content: A Case Against World...

July 9, 2024

The Fed’s Critiques of Rules-Based Monetary Policy Are...

February 11, 2025

Tariffs, Uncertainty, and Small Businesses

March 14, 2025

STATES Act 2.0 Would Make the Federal Government...

December 8, 2023

A Pro-Expression and Innovation Agenda for the New...

December 3, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Frasers Group secures potential £3.5bn war chest to fund growth and acquisitions

      July 3, 2025
    • Roomix raises £850k to expand family-focused custom furniture platform

      July 3, 2025
    • House advances Trump’s massive agenda bill after fiscal hawks cave

      July 3, 2025
    • Technological Innovation: How are Greece and the UK Leading the Way?

      July 3, 2025
    • Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

      July 3, 2025
    • Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash ‘colossal mistake’ shuttering USAID

      July 2, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,368)
    • Investing (2,094)
    • Politics (15,922)
    • Stocks (3,187)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved