Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Sargeant v. Barfield Brief: Holding Prison Officials Accountable for Exposing Inmates to Violence

by September 20, 2024
September 20, 2024
Sargeant v. Barfield Brief: Holding Prison Officials Accountable for Exposing Inmates to Violence

Matthew Cavedon

According to his legal complaint, petitioner Roy Sargeant is a prison inmate who has cooperated with the government and therefore was entitled to be housed separately from non-cooperating inmates. Sargeant filed a grievance against a prison official after she commented on his sexual preferences and refused to give him books he had ordered. Sargeant further complained after respondent Aracelie Barfield, another prison official, spread news about the grievance. In retaliation, Barfield repeatedly put Sargeant into cells with violent prisoners. This led to fights between Sargeant and other inmates.

Sargeant sued Barfield, alleging that she violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment, specifically by failing to protect him during his imprisonment. The district court dismissed his complaint.

On appeal, the Seventh Circuit held that failure-to-protect claims cannot be the basis for a suit for damages under the Supreme Court’s Bivens decision. Dissenting, Judge Hamilton wrote that constitutional rights are only as good as the remedies available for their violation. Sargeant is now seeking certiorari (legal review) from the Supreme Court.

Cato and the Law Enforcement Action Partnership filed an amicus brief in support of Sargeant’s petition. It observed that suits for damages are a potentially highly effective means of enforcing constitutional rights, exposing individual and systemic misconduct, and incentivizing policymakers to adopt needed reforms.

And contrary to the Seventh Circuit’s analysis here, allowing federal prisoners a monetary remedy when a rank-and-file prison official deliberately subjects them to the risk of inmate-on-inmate violence will not present “separation-of-powers concerns” by inviting courts to “interfere with” issues such as prison “housing policies.”

Federal prisoners are among our nation’s most vulnerable populations. It is precisely these people—who generally cannot vote, protest, or garner attention from the media—who are most dependent on the judicial system to vindicate their constitutional rights. The court should grant Sargeant’s petition and reverse the earlier decision.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
How Can Automation Bring A Transformative Change In HR Processes
next post
Friday Feature: St. Ambrose Academy

You may also like

Yard-Sign Libertarianism and Kamalamania

August 20, 2024

Social Security at 89: Time to Retire the...

August 14, 2024

DOGE Recommendations: Federal Health Spending

December 11, 2024

Efficient, Timely and Reliable: A Framework for Election...

March 5, 2024

Dear EPA: Go Back to the Drawing Board

December 21, 2023

5 Budget Process Ideas in the Republican Study...

June 20, 2023

Officials Resign En Masse at Justice Department After...

February 14, 2025

Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade...

May 23, 2025

Expensing Is Key in Any Pro‐​Growth Tax Package

April 20, 2023

Frederick Douglass: Self-Made Man

February 20, 2024

Yard-Sign Libertarianism and Kamalamania

August 20, 2024

Social Security at 89: Time to Retire the...

August 14, 2024

DOGE Recommendations: Federal Health Spending

December 11, 2024

Efficient, Timely and Reliable: A Framework for Election...

March 5, 2024

Dear EPA: Go Back to the Drawing Board

December 21, 2023

5 Budget Process Ideas in the Republican Study...

June 20, 2023

Officials Resign En Masse at Justice Department After...

February 14, 2025

Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade...

May 23, 2025

Expensing Is Key in Any Pro‐​Growth Tax Package

April 20, 2023

Frederick Douglass: Self-Made Man

February 20, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Right Supreme Court Call on Downsizing the US Department of Education

      July 14, 2025
    • From Hammer to Harami: Using StockCharts to Crack the Candlestick Code

      July 14, 2025
    • Jeremy Clarkson slams regulators as ‘most expensive’ Hawkstone beer advert is banned

      July 14, 2025
    • Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

      July 14, 2025
    • ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

      July 14, 2025
    • How the law shapes the reality for motorcyclists after serious injuries

      July 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,475)
    • Investing (2,121)
    • Politics (16,035)
    • Stocks (3,209)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved