Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

United States v. Moore Brief: Universal Disarmament of People on Supervised Release Is Unconstitutional

by September 24, 2024
September 24, 2024
United States v. Moore Brief: Universal Disarmament of People on Supervised Release Is Unconstitutional

Matthew Cavedon

In March 2021, Diontai Moore came home from his birthday party to the townhouse he shared with his fiancee, Gwendolyn Pullie, and her three children in Pittsburgh, PA. At 4:00 a.m. they heard the dog barking. Two people had broken into Pullie’s car outside. Terrified, she and Moore went downstairs and saw “shadowy figures” near the house. Pullie retrieved her gun, gave it to Moore, and escaped with the children. Moore went out back, ultimately shooting one of the intruders in the thigh. At the time, Moore was on federal supervised release. He called his probation officer and explained what had happened. 

The government responded by charging Moore with being a felon in possession of a firearm. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven years in federal prison. 

Moore appealed his conviction to the Third Circuit. It held that the government can forbid every person on supervised release or probation from possessing a firearm.

Cato filed an amicus brief asking the Third Circuit to grant Moore’s petition for rehearing en banc. Disarming all felony probationers reflects a judgment that all felonies are dangerous. That premise is belied by an aggressive, decades-long trend in American politics: overcriminalization. 

Overcriminalization bears out a commonly held fear about the government’s bid for extreme deference: that instead of tethering the Second Amendment to the dangers motivating our regulatory traditions, the government would give legislatures unreviewable power to manipulate the Second Amendment by choosing a label.

Exceptions to individual rights do not move with the political winds. When it comes to individual rights, history—not legislatures—determines the existence and scope of exceptions. That means that courts may not simply assume that the Second Amendment will expand or contract to fit any crime labeled a felony. Rather, courts must confront the reality of what modern felonies look like, and compare that reality to the government’s proposed historical analogues.

Applying history’s lessons to today’s sprawling criminal codes, the court can only conclude that the government has not met its burden to square universal felon disarmament with our regulatory traditions.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
White House Cabinet officials rally around Biden despite backlash over his wife taking control of meeting
next post
No CBDC, Says Canadian, Australian, and Colombian Central Banks

You may also like

Benjamin M. Anderson: Hayek’s Precursor on the Knowledge...

November 18, 2024

Friday Feature: Refine KC

October 6, 2023

The Government Can’t Revoke a Visa Because of...

April 30, 2025

There Are Not 13,099 Illegal Immigrant Murderers Roaming...

September 30, 2024

Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Enshrines Education Choice...

December 12, 2023

Scope Creep: Mandating Disclosure of Scope 3 Emissions...

December 11, 2023

California Wildfires: Policy and Incentives

January 21, 2025

Navigating the Ma(i)ze of Mexico’s GM Corn Ban

October 22, 2023

Thank You, Paul Krugman, for Making the Case...

August 2, 2024

New Data: Immigrant Population Is 2 Million Below...

September 21, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

      June 27, 2025
    • The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

      June 27, 2025
    • Barrett eviscerates Jackson, Sotomayor takes on a ‘complicit’ court in contentious final opinions

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump would strike Iran ‘without question’ if it restarts nuclear weapons program

      June 27, 2025
    • Florida man indicted for ’86’ posts allegedly threatening to kill Alina Habba

      June 27, 2025
    • Top House Republicans send stern warning to Senate GOP as Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ risks delay

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,079)
    • Politics (15,835)
    • Stocks (3,174)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved