Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by December 24, 2024
December 24, 2024

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Charles Norfleet Shares Advice On Navigating the Future of Wealth Management
next post
DOJ Jumps the Shark

You may also like

Justice Department tells American Bar Association it will...

May 29, 2025

Biden Docs: White House requested FBI search that...

January 22, 2023

‘Totally prepared’: Trump allies say he’s better positioned...

January 23, 2025

Democrats continue handing votes to Jeffries, who has...

January 4, 2023

US confirms third round of nuclear talks with...

April 21, 2025

Foreign policy experts rip Tim Walz’s claim that...

June 20, 2025

This Is Interesting: San Francisco Police Dispatcher Describes...

October 29, 2022

48-Year-Old Soccer Journalist Grant Wahl Dies After Collapsing...

December 10, 2022

5 steps the new Trump administration must take to make America healthy again

December 23, 2024

Pope Francis urges Catholic voters to ‘choose the...

September 14, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • The Nation “Don’t Need No Doctor”: Rethinking the Surgeon General’s Office

      July 22, 2025
    • Motor racing dominates automotive sponsorship spend across the Americas in 2025, according to new data

      July 22, 2025
    • London Stock Exchange considers 24-hour trading to boost global competitiveness

      July 22, 2025
    • Mike Lynch’s estate hit with £700m bill as High Court rules in HP’s favour over Autonomy fraud

      July 22, 2025
    • Vauxhall owner Stellantis warns of €2.3bn loss as US tariffs and Europe slowdown take toll

      July 22, 2025
    • Chippie owner hit with ‘devastating’ £40,000 fine for alleged illegal hire amid crackdown

      July 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,546)
    • Investing (2,139)
    • Politics (16,147)
    • Stocks (3,222)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved